Decision Review System: DRS technology expensive, unreliable - Niranjan Shah | India Cricket News | ESPN Cricinfo Half the boards do not even have money. How do they plan on funding this? ICC money comes from India...so technically BCCI would be funding this. Why should they when they do not agree with it fully? Also hotspot will not be possible because of military restrictions. I highly doubt it. what exactly has this done? The govt is trying to integrate two races that have not been friendly...what is the problem with this? Which part of IPL being domestic tournament do you not understand? County cricket had a similar restriction for a long time...which is even more ridiculous since it has only 2 players. Why should they? Just to fill ECB coffers ?? EPL can never be successful without Indian players while IPL will (and is already) be successful without EPL players IPL has unearthed some bright prospects for India - Ashwin, badri, rohit sharma. Also given some players make a comeback. As opposed to the English domestic cricket which has resulted in half the English teams being filled with Irish and south african imports. IPL requires no objection certificate from boards. All boards have to do is not give them. The demise of WI began in early nineties. And the reason the bouncers were reduced and their fast bowlers were effective. Thanks to Eng and Aus who had 2 votes then. Agree. So where do u get propose we get the money from ?? BCCI's primary mandate is to improve cricket in India....not in every board. ICC has to trim costs in other useless stuff like early conferences and DRS Good luck with that. I really like how English fans think so great and powerful of themselves Just like their team thinks they are No. 1 everytime they defeat Australia You speak as if world cricket was flourishing before that. Thanks to Indian money we have teams like Ireland, netherland, bangladesh, Canada playing cricket now. Cricketers are being well payed as well. Taylor and Jayawardane can never dream of a million dollar pay check in their countries When as long as whoever runs the board does not intervene in BCCI finanicial dealings I think they would be fine. BCCI or for that matter any board would be stupid to allow other board make money using them. As an average cricket fan I approve. Statements like the below by some Lord of cricket make me want BCCI to boss ECB more. I cannot see why it would be so bad to have a stupid building in India. Let us not act like saints as if UK and Aus do not bully people or are not corrupt..Money makes good men go bad Look into how county cricket is played. They have player restriction Aus has International player restriction. I seriously don't understand this attraction to a domestic indian tournament. Yes most of the good performers came to the fore due to IPL. Ashwin is a great example. IPLs main motive is for BCCI to make money and to make sure their players get enough exposure. BCCI has never tried to hide it. I frankly do not see a problem here.uite sure the ICC would have turned it down. India just bullied that rule into e "Indian" premier league...so yes need as much Indian players to earn experience and money ..get over it I am starting to hate these Ifs. If cricket was not popular in India it would have been great for the rest of the world. If football was not popular in England and if the rest of ICC countries had more population this would not happen It is what it is . Deal with it Another Iffffff...... I disagree. Weak teams need more exposure. India itself used to be weak not long ago. Same with England...Australia used to roll all over England First win against Bangladesh .....just joking...but seriously how come you lost 4-0?????? Oh wait,....who cares about the truth BCCI did not exert pressure to outlaw ICL - Arendse | India Cricket News | ESPN Cricinfo Are we talking about the Tony Greig who did not care about the well being of world cricket and joined Packer series to make a few fast bucks??? Or is this some other guy???