ICC News: Restructuring the ICC, BCCI Influence & more

sifter132

Panel of Selectors
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Location
NSW
His solution is like the one I support. Merge T20s and ODIs into a 40 over game for international cricket, and make T20 a domestic only format. That way you don't need to extend every international tour by a week to include 2-3 useless T20Is. Would save you a month every year for each team (as they probably do 4 series per year). That's extra time to play domestic cricket or to rest up for international series.

Would be interesting to see the non-rich boards do something about it eg. Sri Lanka were talking about picking a specialist T20I team, led by Angelo Mathews but being predominantly filled with guys who AREN'T playing the other formats. I'd love to see other countries do that as a protest against the international scheduling, and as a slight against the quality of T20Is.
 

War

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Online Cricket Games Owned
I hear you my friend. But i don't think such a drastic measure needs to be taken. Plus i don't think you really can question the standard of T20I's after such a high quality world tournament in sri lanka.

I believe test, 50 overs & t20i can co-exists in the international calendar quite easily. The problem AFAIS is just controlling the amount of outside T20 leagues, the IPL and creating a fairer FTP test programme for all the test nations.
 

spooony

Club Captain
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Location
Cape Town, SA
Online Cricket Games Owned
Its suppose to be independent with no conflict of interest. That means they must have a head quarters preferably in England somewhere where they work from and analyze games that have been played looking ways to take cricket forward.

Not have discussions via speaker phone like they currently do.
 

War

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Online Cricket Games Owned

puddleduck

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Location
Uk
Online Cricket Games Owned
Unfortunately it's really hard to stand up to someone when they're stood on a massive mountain of money.
 

War

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Online Cricket Games Owned
Unfortunately it's really hard to stand up to someone when they're stood on a massive mountain of money.

Well those with authority in the cricket world, with an army war-plane of integrity needs to fly up on them and blow up that mountain.
 

ZoraxDoom

Respected Legend
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Location
Hong Kong
Online Cricket Games Owned
'Those in charge should do something' is a whole different thing from 'Those in charge will do something'.

No one is going to stand up to the BCCI anytime soon. Yes they should, but they won't.
 

War

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Online Cricket Games Owned
Deep down i fear this may be the case already, given that cricket administrators have already fell into a black hole which they can't get out. But we can't give up hope, since once FIFA when England had total control of it, acted in a similar fashion before being cleaned up structurally.

England in India 2012-13 : Media boycott threatened over BCCI photographry stance | Cricket News | India v England | ESPN Cricinfo

Rob Steen : Rob Steen: India's board flexes its muscles because it can | Cricinfo Magazine | ESPN Cricinfo

More horrendous crap from the BCCI. I can't believe they actually tried to block english daily mail reporter martin samules from entering the country, just because he wrote some rough articles about India during the 2011 series :facepalm
 

sifter132

Panel of Selectors
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Location
NSW
^Some good bits though - trying to make the big name players play Ranji trophy is a good move. Not expecting the world to bend over backwards for the IPL and give it a window shows he's not THAT arrogant.

I also sympathise with him about DRS, it does have some problems. But I think those problems would get solved sooner if India joined in the movement towards technology - not blindly accepting it, but at least being constructive in it's criticism, rather than just saying anything less than 100% is useless.
 

War

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Online Cricket Games Owned
^Some good bits though - trying to make the big name players play Ranji trophy is a good move. Not expecting the world to bend over backwards for the IPL and give it a window shows he's not THAT arrogant.

I also sympathise with him about DRS, it does have some problems. But I think those problems would get solved sooner if India joined in the movement towards technology - not blindly accepting it, but at least being constructive in it's criticism, rather than just saying anything less than 100% is useless.

Talking Cricket : N Srinivasan: 'I don't think it's fair to call the BCCI a bully' | Cricinfo Magazine | ESPN Cricinfo

Now reading the full interview, the things he said about ranji trophy and development in india is pretty much what you would expect him to say as the BCCI head.

Otherwise when pressed on the drs, bcci bullying, role of bcci in world cricket, the ridiculous bcci position on tv rights which has forced england fans skysports coverage to not have the commentary team on the ground in india is very evasive and illogical.

The BCCI position on drs is indefensible. No one cares if the BCCI only doesn't think the technology is perfect. Majority rules - so he should shut his trap. The fact that he can say that it doesn't bother him that cricket records are being constantly disrespected by one series being played without drs and one with drs - is an appalling statement.

In FIFA currently goal-line technology is coming & uefa president michel platini always likes to talk crap about the his mistrust of technology. UEFA is the BCCI of football when it comes to financial power - but when goal-line technology comes in - everywhere in uefa will use because FIFA is boss.

As we all know in cricket BCCI is boss over ICC, so that's why they have been able to oppose drs. A strong ICC would have made them use it. Its a hot mess.
 
Last edited:

War

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Online Cricket Games Owned
Why BCCI doesn't like FICA head Tim May? - The Times of India

Board games show cricket's true powerplay | Cricinfo Magazine | ESPN Cricinfo

http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/634427.html

One again the lawless BCCI flexes its stinking muscle. May was one of the few men with any clout in world cricket who spoke out well against Indian's obscene influence in world cricket & spoke of ways to eradicate it. So basically if one reads between the lines, this is just the BCCI way of getting back at & getting rid of one of their biggest dissenters. :facepalm

Cricket needs a journalist like Andrew Jennings who has had FIFA corrupt officials tight over the last 30 years, to put the BCCI feet to fire. India getting away with murder every month & the entire cricket world just taking their money & shutting up like true pussies..
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top