So you mean to say a team that managed 241/4 in just 32 overs wouldn't have seen off 302 in 50 overs?
England were 27-2 needing 281 to win the 3rd ODI (which's greater than the required target here), before the match ended in a tie...
So if anything, this should have been England's game...
Well why not? England team obviously proved it. Compared to 27-2 (281), 129-0 is better(272) especially in India where wickets are flat. And still they found a way to lose.
5th ODI: India v England at Kolkata, Oct 25, 2011 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo
Last edited: