Cricket 22 General Discussion thread (Use bug report thread for issues/bugs/crashes | Patch notes in first post)

Skillzy

School Cricketer
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Would Prefer Cricket 19 with cricket 22 graphics only not even animation. Also this game is little smoother while previous one stutters. They should have just improved the game without changing the things which were already decent.
 

gkvarma18

Associate Cricketer
Joined
Jun 29, 2016
Location
Hyderabad , India
Profile Flag
India
Online Cricket Games Owned
  1. Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Steam PC
The career mode had huge potential. The scheduling is broken. They could have easily added a ranking feature to add more excitement to the player as well as the international team. There is no trophy cabinet.
The game could have done so much more in respect to stats alone which would have satisfied a good chunk of customers.
 

Theonlygod

School Cricketer
Joined
Nov 19, 2021
People had hugh expectations from C22 and bought the game the first day, but the game has given little more than a middle finger to the buyers, a broken game, with no "ETA" of getting fixed, lacks the promised features, such as the newzealand and Ireland playfaces, There's no actual way to control the weather, commentry is abs. Garbage, fps issues, wierd looking shadows, no proper highlights reel
This is was legit scam by BigAnt
 

MARK99ZA

County Cricketer
Joined
Dec 22, 2016
Location
Cape Town, South Africa
Profile Flag
South Africa
Online Cricket Games Owned
  1. Don Bradman Cricket 14 - PS3
  2. Don Bradman Cricket 14 - PS4
People had hugh expectations from C22 and bought the game the first day, but the game has given little more than a middle finger to the buyers, a broken game, with no "ETA" of getting fixed, lacks the promised features, such as the newzealand and Ireland playfaces, There's no actual way to control the weather, commentry is abs. Garbage, fps issues, wierd looking shadows, no proper highlights reel
This is was legit scam by BigAnt
To redeem themselves they should follow a similar approach Hello Games did with No Mans Sky. Keep adding to the base game, and do not release a sequel that consumers need to fork out money on yet again. We have spent enough money on these games now - time for Big Ant to give us something back
 

Mr Snrub

International Coach
Joined
Aug 7, 2006
People had hugh expectations from C22 and bought the game the first day, but the game has given little more than a middle finger to the buyers, a broken game, with no "ETA" of getting fixed, lacks the promised features, such as the newzealand and Ireland playfaces, There's no actual way to control the weather, commentry is abs. Garbage, fps issues, wierd looking shadows, no proper highlights reel
This is was legit scam by BigAnt
I wouldn't go so far as a scam, the game is largely functional. A decent way off completely functional though. There are too many sub-standard issues. The list you have is just a few of them.

It's increasingly obvious though that they are less and less interested in community engagement. That seems to have gotten worse the further we've moved from the release date, they showed they cared a lot back then and it was almost a patch a day back then as the game was an inarguable joke for a while there.

Communication was pretty frequent. We were hearing things like they were going to release some exciting features and that they weren't done with the game. It lead some over-hopeful people to think something similar to an ultimate team feature was potentially coming.

What's happened since? Some bug and crash fixes, but it's been two steps forward, one backwards almost every patch. No special features at all really. Just a game at about the same level as C'19, with different issues overall from the creation suite through to the game. An advancement? Nope, a step sideways. That's what we're supposed to be grateful for.

Now people are encountering a CEO on Twitter who seems to have gotten increasingly snooty and frustrated at people with legitimate concerns about his product. Of more concern than people being happy with the game, he seems more focused on a gleeful victory over software pirates.

It's disappointing, because the game has potential (especially with people like Rumple trying to find a way to make the gameplay more balanced), but who knows, we might count ourselves lucky to get another few minor 2 forwards, 1 backwards patches before they abandon the game for good.
 

Kiko_97

User Title Purchaser
Joined
Aug 5, 2007
Profile Flag
England
I wouldn't go so far as a scam, the game is largely functional. A decent way off completely functional though. There are too many sub-standard issues. The list you have is just a few of them.

It's increasingly obvious though that they are less and less interested in community engagement. That seems to have gotten worse the further we've moved from the release date, they showed they cared a lot back then and it was almost a patch a day back then as the game was an inarguable joke for a while there.

Communication was pretty frequent. We were hearing things like they were going to release some exciting features and that they weren't done with the game. It lead some over-hopeful people to think something similar to an ultimate team feature was potentially coming.

What's happened since? Some bug and crash fixes, but it's been two steps forward, one backwards almost every patch. No special features at all really. Just a game at about the same level as C'19, with different issues overall from the creation suite through to the game. An advancement? Nope, a step sideways. That's what we're supposed to be grateful for.

Now people are encountering a CEO on Twitter who seems to have gotten increasingly snooty and frustrated at people with legitimate concerns about his product. Of more concern than people being happy with the game, he seems more focused on a gleeful victory over software pirates.

It's disappointing, because the game has potential (especially with people like Rumple trying to find a way to make the gameplay more balanced), but who knows, we might count ourselves lucky to get another few minor 2 forwards, 1 backwards patches before they abandon the game for good.
Ross' attitude on twitter is massively offputting as a buyer, any relevant criticism is met with a block, there's no urgency to answer legitimate questions and he seems more focused on the new AFL Game they've moved onto.

I'd love to know why and how they can't use playface tech to improve likenesses and why they haven't updated England kits for a new manufacturer who surely would be pissed their branding isn't included in marketing for a current game.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top