England vs Sri Lanka - First Test :: Sponsored by Marcus Trescothick's Cricket Coach

[nightprowler10]

The way points are done on this makes no sense to me. Unbelieveable.

The winner had a player who didn't contribute where as 2nd, 3rd and fourth had the best 11 performers in the game.

I lost all my VCASH.

Well his captain was Pietersen. He scored 158 runs, but since he was his captain, all that doubled, which more than made up for his other player. Pietersen was the key.

 

[Sureshot]

KP also took 3 catches iirc. Another 30 points when doubled.

Most Valuable Captain would have been Jayawardene, at 400.

 

[ZexyZahid]

I took the time to check the scores out again. I found one mistake: Nuwan Kulasekara was listed as 73 batting points, but should have 93 batting points. But it shouldn't make much difference I feel in the standings, since probably nobody would have had him. And that's the only thing I could find.

I checked the standings after that update randomly, but didn't see any change, so I didn't post the whole standings here.

If you see some other errors, feel free to report. But there shouldn't be any errors now. Here is the scorecard: http://usa.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2006/SL_IN_ENG/SCORECARDS/SL_ENG_T1_11-15MAY2006.html