Having looked at Eng/Aus mens teams. Defo feel they're 'over rated' Just to meet the (best player/teams of the game have to be 90+). I know it's a simple fix of doing it myself and changing them down but even if the licensed teams/player are wayyyyyyyy out of whack with skills. Where do we start? I'm guessing the skills for created teams are taking them as a base for the other teams. Over the course of 3 games it's not changed that skills are still 'unknown' the outcomes. A part of me feels the 'skills' for players are completely broken. I don't know maybe because I've tried changing skills about so much it's fried my brain.
I was quite meticulous in creating something consistent with the licensed players to try a way of skilling players. Then when I tried it, with those 1993 sides, I just took each batting skill down 10 points and it seems better so far. Allan Border scored 150 against with Judgement 82, Footwork 76, Control 82, Attacking 76, Defending 80, Drive 78, Cut 82, Hook 81, Glance 80, Sweep 80, Special Shots 61. He played and missed plenty too. So did Paul Reiffel and his stats are far lower.
The one thing that is easy to evaluate are the Technical Abilities.
Agility and Run Speed seem to be fine with 50 at the top scale
Cardio and Anaerobic need to be 80+ or fast bowlers get knackered
Strength at with 65 as a max seems fine.
You can work out bowling speeds - I think they go up about 1mph every ten points.
