Eoin, Virat or Umar?

SaiSrini

Respected Legend
CSK
PlanetCricket Award Winner
Joined
Apr 26, 2003
Location
USA
Umar has shown more promise. Virat is slowly starting to express himself. Tough call, lets see. Right now for the moment, its Umar but Virat with more matches will really open up even more.
 

SciD

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Feb 11, 2006
Online Cricket Games Owned
Pakistan batsman come and go. Cannot say anything about its players.

Eoin Morgan has been good in the games he has played. Virat's own enemy is Virat. If he can keep his head on his shoulders he can be part of Indian middle order.
 

ZoraxDoom

Respected Legend
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Location
Hong Kong
Online Cricket Games Owned
Akmal is screwed by being Pakistani.

Morgan's never going to get all the chances he deserves at England.

Kohli's never going to be dropped by India.


Therefore, Kohli wins :p
 

King Pietersen

ICC Board Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Location
Manchester
Morgan's never going to get all the chances he deserves at England.

Why do you believe that? If anything, being foreign will provide him with more chances than if he was English :p You could argue that he certainly didn't deserve his call-up in the first place, his List A record in England was not too impressive, and he was being outperformed in County cricket that season by Ed Joyce. Was only really 1 brilliant innings that got him noticed. He's taken full advantage though, and looked brilliant.
 

Aoun13

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Location
Rawalpindi (Pak)
Profile Flag
Pakistan
Online Cricket Games Owned
  1. Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Steam PC
Umar for sure
Player who can perform when whole batting line is continuously failing is enough to say he is best.
 

JD10

International Cricketer
Joined
Sep 1, 2007
Location
North England/Melbourne
Umar for sure
Player who can perform when whole batting line is continuously failing is enough to say he is best.
Bit biased mate? Umar, Virit and Eoin show more promise each time they bat. Eoin is an awesome batsman IMO, Virit looks good from what i can see and Umar i havn't saw much of him
 

Aoun13

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Apr 2, 2008
Location
Rawalpindi (Pak)
Profile Flag
Pakistan
Online Cricket Games Owned
  1. Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Steam PC
bias?bias for what if you don't see him play its your fault.
 

ZoraxDoom

Respected Legend
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Location
Hong Kong
Online Cricket Games Owned
Why do you believe that? If anything, being foreign will provide him with more chances than if he was English :p You could argue that he certainly didn't deserve his call-up in the first place, his List A record in England was not too impressive, and he was being outperformed in County cricket that season by Ed Joyce. Was only really 1 brilliant innings that got him noticed. He's taken full advantage though, and looked brilliant.
Lack of slots in England's middle order, and their chop/change nature. Look how Shah was treated till he was finally dumped for good. And England aren't likely to drop Collingwood, Prior or KP soon, and Wright and Strauss are probably going to take up spots as well. It seems unlikely Morgan will get an extended run. Plus, plenty of competition in Joyce, Carberry, Trott, Denly, Bopara, etc. means a few failures and he could be dumped for some time before being seen again.
 

ZoraxDoom

Respected Legend
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Location
Hong Kong
Online Cricket Games Owned
So wait, 20/20 Pro is being accused of being biased when he himself is accusing send2yaari of being biased?
 

ballers101

Club Cricketer
Joined
Apr 13, 2006
Location
Toronto, Canada
Online Cricket Games Owned
Okay first off. Eoin Morgan is a limited overs player, he plays well in limited overs however, I believe the real game of cricket is test cricket and because Eoin Morgan isn't a great test cricketer I would say he wouldn't be the best out of the 3. He plays very well in limited overs however so he could be a very good middle order batsmen for England. Virat Kohli has not played a test match yet so we do not know how good he REALLY is. Yes he has a couple of hundreds and his average is fairly high but he played extremely well against Bangledesh. However, in the final against Sri Lanka he did very poorly and got out for 2 in a match where they needed him to play well this shows how he can be a match winner but at the same time he can fail for the team. He will be a can be a very good player at the same time he could become a player who gets a good score every 5 or 6 matches. However, if you look at Umar Akmal you can see he is a lot potiential as well. He has played extremely against world class teams like Australia and New Zealand. He does not crack under pressure just like in the last match he got the highest score for the team but because Pakistan gave the match away they lost. Even in the current match its not his fault he was playing well but because of Salman Butt he was run out. He has played well in all forms of cricket and he is a match winner who does not crack under the pressure. He is also the youngest out of the three with also the least experience however, he has been the most promising at the same time. This is why I believe he will be the best out of the three cricketers. Also, about the fact that he will be dropped out of the side. Pakistan is stupid when it comes to choosing the sides but they know that Umar Akmal is the most talented cricketer on their team. They have Kamran Akmal on the team and they have left him on the team because they believe he is a talented batsmen. Umar Akmal is far more talented so why in the world would Pakistan drop him based on how they work with Kamran Akmal.
 

Dare

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
May 29, 2006
Location
London, Canada
Online Cricket Games Owned
So wait, 20/20 Pro is being accused of being biased when he himself is accusing send2yaari of being biased?

thats the only reason I said it, because he accused send2yaari of being biased but then he says "Morgan is an awesome batsman".
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top