I was mentioning how the boos were constant and not just as the result of something that Moeen had done during the game. And that opening paragraph is contradictory to say the least.
He didn't get booed because he's from Pakistan, but because he has a connection to Pakistan? His connection is his race, his heritage. He is being booed because of this. How is that in any way, shape or form, acceptable?
If an Indian player comes to play County cricket and rocks up in Derby, say, and gets booed from first ball to the last, every time he touches the ball, is that acceptable? The answer is, or course not. Booing because of where a person comes from is discrimination. Something that I and a lot of other people on this forum and around the world, have a problem with.
You clearly have a hard time understanding things.
Your entire post is a contradiction. When you boo Aussie players are you not doing because of their heritage? Why else are you booing them. Because they are aussies playing against england? So is the connection there not their race and nationality and heritage?
Here Moenn Ali was just booed, the kind of abusive songs you guys make up about Aussie players is frankly appalling. Is that not done merely because they are Aussies and because of their nationality and heritage, I don't see anyone complaining then.
First of all booing is not a form of racial abuse, I don't care how you extend it. Moenn Ali got booed, purely because he is playing against India, and has a connection with India's biggest
cricketing rival Pakistan. The connection here is not Moen Ali's heritage, but rather India's rivarly from Pakistan. If India had no
cricketing rivalry with Pakistan, then he would not be booed even with his Pakistan connection. So the booing is not coming from the hatred of his race or color, but from the
cricketing rivalry India has with pakistan. So the stick he is getting is purely cricket related, and that is India-Pak rivalry in cricket. Why is it so hard for you understand this. Had this cricketing rivalry not existed, he would not get stick, even this his Pakistani heritage and all.
The reason for him being booed, is thus purely cricket related. He could have been a Hindu and had a connection with pakistan, and he would still have gotten booed. Why can't you wrap your head around this fact. India Pakistan have a rivalry and on the cricket field some fans booed him for that connection. Thus the underlying reason for him being booed, is purely the
cricket rivalry connection. No one gives damn whether he is a muslim or a christian. He could have been a hindu and still been booed like I said.
Now if you cannot wrap your head around this, what can I say. Also in your example of Indian players getting booed in county cricket. Is there any
cricketing reason to boo Indian players? Yes in Moenn ALi's case as I have said, the reason for him being booed, is purely
cricketing. He was not booed because he has a Pakistani heritage. In isolation his Pakistani heritage is irrelevant to anyone and everyone. The reason he got booed, is because underneath all this is the cricketing rivalry that India and Pakistan share.
Why is it so hard for you to understand this simple thing, I do not know. In an ideal world yes no one should get stick, and not even Moenn Ali should have gotten booed. I agree. However, to try and misplace a booing that comes purely on cricketing ground, for racial abuse of the worst kind is just nonsense.