andrew_nixon
Chairman of Selectors
It could be the blue and red of the Union Jack.
The blue comes from the Scottish flag, and England represents England and Wales, not the UK.
It could be the blue and red of the Union Jack.
The blue comes from the Scottish flag, and England represents England and Wales, not the UK.
That's ooooooooold!India should've worn this: http://www.freewebs.com/sachinrameshtendulkar/photo121.jpg
Kind of unclear image but i like that kit.
Seems to go well with the whole T20 thing..
That's ooooooooold!
Yup, I agree with that. The current kit is something I would be embarrassed to use as pajamas.looks awesome tho.
Favorite all time kit : WC 2003 one.
Why aren't any of the teams allowed logos on their shirts, Australia din't have the 3 stripes of adidas, South Africa haven't got the chevrons of hummel, why not, what is the ICC's problem, it doesn't bother FIFA. Why do England havea blue kit? There is no blue on the St George flag, the kit should be red & white.
ICC's marketing clause prohibits teams from showing off their sponsors on the chest.
You will observe that the sponsors are there on the leading arm of the kit.
As far as England is concerned,I have no idea why they have such a kit.It does look good though.
I actually did use the replica of the india teams current kit as pajamas last nightYup, I agree with that. The current kit is something I would be embarrassed to use as pajamas.