We're not underestimating it, Melbourne and Sydney have a huge rivalry in Australia. Our soccer teams are psycho when they play each other. I hate Sydney, but I wouldn't throw a flare to prove my point!Interesting question. Personally when I was watching the Chennai Superstars (my home team) versus the Hyderabad heroes, I was desperate for our overseas players to knock the leather off the opposition team's Indian players. Which unfortunately didn't happenIn fact it was the other way round
When it comes to the domestic games, I prefer overseas players of my home team to Indian superstars of the opposition. So will the concept be a success? Of course it will.
It all boils down to the context. International cricket will have its own parallel rivalries which will not get affected by the domestic scene.
And to all non-Indians on PC, you under-estimate the power of Indian regional rivalries.![]()
That is a very valid question. I dont think in India the fans are as concerned or passionate about their state/regional teams as in other countries like Australia and England.
That is a very valid question. I dont think in India the fans are as concerned or passionate about their state/regional teams as in other countries like Australia and England.
First of all, that's not equivalent. You're comparing an England vs. England rivalry against an Australia vs. India rivalry. Secondly, it depends on how it is promoted. It seems that they are trying to build franchises and if they succeed then it would appear that players would follow their domestic teams rather than player names. Of course, players of the fame of Tendulkar, Ganguly may have some partial support from other supporters.As a county fan, I'd be cheering my ass off if one of Kent's bowlers bowled, say, Pietersen for a duck in county. So my question to Indian fans is do you see yourselves caring more about your IPL team than your allegiance to Indian cricket and its superstars?
Oh yes they shall. If I understand correctly the rules limit the number of internationals and national players who can play in a team at a given time. And the squads must be made up of local players from the "catchment areas".But I see the IPL as very different to the Aussie domestic scene; as the IPL are privately owned franchises and will likely have a rotating door of squads. They don't represent their local area so much as the company/consortium that owns them.
No I'm not, that bowler could be Yasir Arafat or Ryan McLaren it wouldn't make any difference to how happy I'd be.First of all, that's not equivalent. You're comparing an England vs. England rivalry against an Australia vs. India rivalry.
When playing for the Indian team, Sachin and other stars are who I will always be rooting for.
But...
When the SuperKings are bowling to him, i'd hope to god that he gets out.![]()
That is a very valid question. I dont think in India the fans are as concerned or passionate about their state/regional teams as in other countries like Australia and England.
That's what I believe the organisers will exploit - those regional rivalries. That should bring the crowds and generate a lot of interest in India. Not so much elsewhere but that really doesn't matter. Win the locals first and let the rest catch on, if only to a small extent.IPL is coming to develop that passion of state/regional teams. Thats the new concept. Just becoz its not yet there, I wont say it wont work
Also as harish says, there is lot of regionalism in Indian cricket and the administration. This IPL will bring it to the fore.