Chetan0304
Chairman of Selectors
Till now i thought yes but after the some incidents recently it shows the coach shows much of his superiority and may end/ struggle that players career.
I meant to say that if the captain selects a team not entirely in agreement with the selection panel, then they hold him accountable and sack him.Lol it's not always the captains fault. What can he do if the players aren't playing well.
Not always been the case though. I'm pretty sure Waugh had a say in the selection of his sides. Ok he didn't control it, but he had input. That has to be the way to go, there is no point in Selectors picking players that the Captain doesn't want, the Captain should be interagral in selection although that does not mean he should get it his own way all the time. But he needs to be involved in selection as he has to take the can when in all goes pear shaped. Afterall who else is better placed to have a say on who should have a place in the squad, the penguins?It's different for each country, Australia gives the captain very little say in the selection table. Ponting has no power over who is picked in his 11, as I'm sure he didn't want White for the India Test series which showed by the lack of faith in his bowling. Also Ponting wanted experience for our test opener but again the selectors went against him by picking Hughes. Of course he does get a say, see Symonds in the 03 World Cup as a prime example.