Inzaman is the best

Status
Not open for further replies.

Priyakant

Banned for Account Faking
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Online Cricket Games Owned
Former pak captain Imran Khan praised inzamam for
what he has done to pak cricket.and saying he is
no doubt he is the worlds best now.He said this
on MONDAY NOV O5."INAZAMAM IS THE WORLDS BEST BATS
NOW AND THE GREATEST LEGEND BATSMAN PAK HAS PROD..
INZAMAM HAS CHANGED THE FUTURE OF PAK CRICKET.HE
PROVED IT AGAIN THAT HE IS NO DOUBT THE WORLD BEST
now the best thing about this topic is he said
this when lara made that double hunderd.comparing
inzi"s inn to lara 200 he said thats the BIGGEST
DIFFERENT BETWWEN INZAMAM AND OTHER PLAYERS IN
THE WORLD.BESIDE A GREAT PLAYER INZI ISA MATCH.WIN
HE SAID LARA MADE THAT 200 PLUS WHEN W.I ALREADY
HAS LOST THE SEREIS.WHERE AS INZI PLAY THOSE INN
WHEN PAK REQUIRED.the great thing between about
inzi is he has a great cricketing mind.look how he
has disabeld the ENG team.one of the strongest
team in the world.INZAMAM HAS CHANEGED THE FUTURE
OF PAK CRICKET.imran khan.wow wow wow.

INZAMAM has been the most successful batsman of
recent time.the only one can match him might be
Lara.although he is a head of him as well.but Lara
is a world class player.you never now what he does
at what time.Sachin is not any more thier with
INZAMAM OR LARA.WHAT do you guys think.
INZAMAM IS THE BEST.

frist of all lara is just a selfish player.look W.I have already lost the sereies now lara is performing.second what r u talking about inzamam playing against the worlds best bowling attack coze England has beaten AUS So they r the best and look how inzi has played so far and the result pak ahead of the test sreies at the moment and if inzi play in the last test they will win.rust me lara is a selfish player and i mean it

check this out gal.lara made 375 and 400*.but what happen they end up in draw.while the same thing but huge different bcoz pak has won that match by an inning when inzi made 329 against newzeland.the reason was inzi didnot play for his health he could have score 400 as well but instead of looking to score the world record he start attacking the opposition,in procees he last his wicket.thats called a master hero.not lara,he is so selfish i think thats why his team doesnot like him as well.as always have problem with him.they know he is just on his record nothing else.while inzamam has won pak matches since he start playing for pak.and now look at him where he is at.the worlds best the entire world agrees with that.even former cricketer they all very match agree inzi is the best at this moment.

check this out lara made 375 and 400*.but what happen they end up in draw.while the same thing but huge different bcoz pak has won that match by an inning when inzi made 329 against newzeland.the reason was inzi didnot play for his health he could have score 400 as well but instead of looking to score the world record he start attacking the opposition,in procees he last his wicket.thats called a master hero.not lara,he is so selfish i think thats why his team doesnot like him as well.as always have problem with him.they know he is just on his record nothing else.while inzamam has won pak matches since he start playing for pak.and now look at him where he is at.the worlds best the entire world agrees with that.even former cricketer they all very match agree inzi is the best at this moment.

ENG all rounder A.Flintoff said the biggest differ
between eng and pak was inzamam ul haq.as we did
expected inzy is the main threat for us as our
captain did mention that before the series start.
talking to Geo tv flintoff said inzy has been one
of the greatest batsman in the world for aquit
some times now.he said we know it if some thing
need to happen for pak it would be inzamam.and
that was the case as we expacted.he said they all
the mathods of geting inzy out but the man is just
none movable.he was rock solid.flintoff said they
might have lost the test series but their team is
still very strong and will come back well in odi"s
he said we have specail plan this time for geting
inzy out hopefuly.GETING INZAMAM OUT REQUIRED A
MAGIC. A.Flintoff.

the biggest different between inzamam and the two
others lara and sachin can be defined like that.
INZAMAM 24 100"S 18 MATCH WINNING INN. AVE 122.23
LARA 31 100"S 8 MATCH WINNING INN. AVE 36.42
SACHIN 34 100"S 11 MATCH WINNING INN. AVE 41.53
Now u guys can see the differnt on ur own.and tell
me who is better.inzamam is by far better than any
other cricketer in the world.the only one with a
better ave is D.Bradman.
D.Bradman 23 match winning 100"s at an ave of
slightly better than inzamam.AVE 123.81.BUT he is
retaired so inzy will break that record as well.he
almost did in the lost test but unfortunatly he
got out on 97.

inzamam ul haq once again define him self last night as the best in the world.81* at a stage were every one thoght pak might bowled out for 150 but inzi helped them to get a staisfied total.the pitch where evry one straggle inzi played it realy easy.he proved it he is the worlds best ever our era have waitnessed.he is truly the best ever i have seen.greatest of all time inzamam ul haq.sachin and lara no way close to him

Thats enough evidence to prove Inzy is the worlds best batsmen.

By the way I am not a kid I am 17 years old, if u dont belive me ask Amit (Indiangod) he is the same computing class as me, it is dinner time right now. Anyway I hope Amit reads this at dinner when he comes back to see how wrong he is saying "Lara is the best in tests and Sachin is the best in odis ", dont all of you think Amit is wrong?, well I do I think Inzy is the best.
 
Inzy has certainly been in superb form against England, but I wouldn't go so far as saying he's the best in the world. Lack of physical fitness counts against him, he can't pick up singles as well as other top batsmen.
 
Priyakant, the way you have written the post shows me you've got some serious prejudice. Inzamam is good but the stats are misleading. Inzamam has had better support from his bowlers, Imran, Waqar, Wasim, Saqlain, who are match winning bowlers. India and WIndies haven't had any decent bowlers who back up the efforts of the batsmen.
 
Last edited:
Adarsh said:
If you wanted we could have had a serious discussion about Inzamam. But the way you have written the post shows me you've got some serious prejudice.

Inzy is the worlds best, next to Bradman. By the way I was hoping for a serious talk anyway.
 
Inzy the second best ever? He's good, but not that good. What happened the Sachin and Lara? I would call Inzamam the 2nd best if he took more singles and got more runs.
 
Priyakant said:
Inzy is the worlds best, next to Bradman. By the way I was hoping for a serious talk anyway.
AHAHAAHAHA OK not

And your post says "Lara is selfish" lol.....
 
oh my God. Have you taken a contract for inzi or something?
Dude...why do you think nobody is saying lara or sachin is far greater than bradman. For one thing, they are not; the other thing is that we wanna talk sense.

Inzi far greater than bradman...give me a break.
Man, your comments will only make people drift away from inzi. Even the ones who support inzi won't support you.

With each single innings of his, he is proving more and more that he IS definitely the third best of this time (though ponting will give him much competition). But to equal or beat what lara or sachin has done over the years, over the decade.......he needs another decade. Does he have that?

Off the top of my head, i think either imran or wasim has said inzi is equal to lara and sachin. I can't remember any more names. Can you help me? I would be especially thankful if you can mention some non-pakistani names.

Inzi might be joint third with ponting and dravid, thanks to his good match wining record. .Theres one thing I CAN say though, ponting has more match-winning centuries than inzi in fewer matches 8) .
 
Drewska said:
Inzy the second best ever? He's good, but not that good. What happened the Sachin and Lara? I would call Inzamam the 2nd best if he took more singles and got more runs.


Not of all time.

Got the likes of Sachin, Lara, Pollock and maybe Richards ahead of him.
 
For a guy who loves Inzamam this much should know how to spell his name. I love Inzamam and have a lot of respect for the big man, but to say that he is the greatest batsman of all time is just pure ignorance. He is definitely one of best of this era.
 
andrew_nixon said:
And Sobers, WG Grace, Jack Hobbs, and whichever Richards you're not thinking of.....

Hammond?

50k first class runs.

Oh and of course ME :crying
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top