Quality of Cricket 2004

Arrie

Club Cricketer
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Online Cricket Games Owned
Today I checked the review of Rugby 2004 at here.
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/sports/rugby200...004/review.html
Remeber this game is offered by same developrs who are offering us cricket 2004.What a poor game Rugby 2004 is.May be Rugby 2006 will be developed by new company.

However, I am still sure that cricket 2004 will be pretty good game because they have expeience in this regard.So they will learn from their mistakes.In addition, the cricket team is lead by a person who was involved in making Brian Lara .So situation will not be same here.What you guys think in this regard?
 
hi every body
ya it will be better than cricket2002 . cz it have 75 cricket stadiums n 3000 cricket players . i think if the players in each team like a cricket captain 2002 so it will be more exciting bcz we have a lot of options too choose players thnx every body.
 
This is the source of the infomation you're talking about and I seriously doubt it's accuracy. 3000 players is far too many and they've already given it 4 stars!!!
 
I think they should acquire Cricket 2000's source as well and feature the best of both C2000 and C2002. For example, C2000 had a tru-3D camera as far as replay is concerned. This feature should be incorporated in C2K4. Actually, CWC99 controls weren't too bad. The gameplay suffered coz there wasn't much we could do with those controls other than straight drive and square cut. If correctly implemented CWC controls cud be more favored in future.
 
Originally posted by andrew_nixon79@Oct 24 2003, 05:23 PM
Look at that site... it's a customer review! What would a customer know about a game that hasn't been released yet!
EA only gave themselves 4 *s!
If I was going to go around writing customer reviews, I'd write a better one than that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top