graemejw
Club Cricketer
Didnt you use statistics to classify the players? : Anyways I dont want this to go any futher.Originally posted by andrew_nixon79@Jul 5 2003, 10:19 AM
I was just making a point that statistics can't really be used to show who is a good player.
I think a lot of people are called all-rounders when in fact they're simply batsmen who can bowl, or bowlers who can bat, it's very rare you get a genuine all-rounder. In current international cricket I'd say the list of genuine all-rounders is:
Kallis
Flintoff
Cairns
Andrew Hall (maybe)
And if you're being picky about the defintion of an all-rounder, a case could be made for Alec Stewart.
Batsmen who can bowl well
Tendulkar
Ganguly
Jayasuria
Mark Butcher (occasionally)
Micheal Vaughan
Andrew Symonds
Shahid Afridi
Bowlers who can bat well
Azhar Mahmood
Ian Harvey
Andy Bichel
Heath Streak
Wasim Akram
Shaun Pollock
Even in the past you can only make a case for a few players of being genuine all-rounders, probably WG Grace, Ian Botham and Garfield Sobers
That list is almost perfect. Almost because you can always add players like Chris Galye, Shoaib Malik, Chaminda Vass, and some others...