I think it was a better performance than versus Kenya. Canada found someone with a bit in him, but to either lambaste Australia or applaud Canada for that player's effort is overly simplistic. I still think the bowlers were better against SL and NZ, but they came back and bowled Canada out. They also seemed a little more on their pace. The batting at the top was much closer to what is expected.
If you take out the first 6 or 7 overs, then the Aussie bowling was quite good really. It was just a bit of arrogance in those first few overs, expecting raw pace to do it against a poor team. Still have to bowl straight though - way too much width on offer in those first few overs, and full credit to Patel who hit the gaps really well. Was a good wakeup call.
Again I'm not happy with Haddin's batting - the quality of, not the quantity of runs... He mishit HEAPS of shots (Watson did yesterday as well at the start). His constant backing away to leg is going to get found out and his lack of strike rotation is not good either.
The Australian camp is talking about the openers batting for a long time if they can and I'm beginning to wonder if Haddin is really 'that guy'. The partnership has worked so far in this tournament, but Haddin always seems to have to force shots (probably because he's hopeless at ticking the board over), and I can't see how a guy who is always forcing shots is going to consistently offer you long innings at the top against the better teams.