Ratings Discussion

[nz0003]

Player - BattingRating/BowlingRating

P Hughes - 70/5
S Katich - 69/44
R Ponting - 83/39
M Hussey - 72/48
M Clarke - 79/56
M North - 68/57
B Haddin - 68/WK
M Johnson - 53/82
N Hauritz - 30/65
P Siddle - 29/75
B Hilfenhaus - 25/72

A Strauss - 70/5
A Cook - 66/5
R Bopara - 62/43
K Pietersen - 79/52
P Collingwood - 70/56
M Prior - 57/WK
A Flintoff - 76/84
S Broad - 37/80
G Swann - 50/76
J Anderson - 34/86
M Panaser - 40/69

These are from the demo's on Hard Mode, discuss.

 

[MattW]

They are not the final ones.

 

[rlfan82]

can we post fastest (legal) balls by the seamers

 

[nz0003]

Post anything exciting in here haha.

nz0003 added 18 Minutes and 32 Seconds later...

They are not the final ones.

They'd be close to it wouldn't they?

 

[MasterBlaster76]

They are not the final ones.

Does that confirm that the demo is an old build?

 

[Helicon]

I think the following batting ratings are notably out, much more so than the bowling and I suggest the following:

Flintoff 60ish (76)
Prior 65ish (57)
Broad 45ish (37)
Monty 25ish (40)

Bowling I would suggest Broad is too high, Hilfenhaus too low?

Anyone agree/disagree?

 

[dajesmac]

Oh thank god that rumour that Flintoff's batting was higher than any Australians isn't true.

dajesmac added 0 Minutes and 38 Seconds later...

Flintoff is not better than Hussey! And Strauss is way better than Hughes!

 

[Swingers]

The ratings also seem to change depending on the pitch state I assume, only just noticed yesterday but when I was playing with England when I lost a wicket KP's rating was 81 and the time before 79 when you choose who comes in next.

 

[dajesmac]

The ratings also seem to change depending on the pitch state I assume, only just noticed yesterday but when I was playing with England when I lost a wicket KP's rating was 81 and the time before 79 when you choose who comes in next.

If so, then awesome! Should be the same for bowlers you would think.

NOW, they say you can gain skill for players and allocate them, but wouldn't that just mean that every player will end up with 100 in the end?

dajesmac added 1 Minutes and 25 Seconds later...

I think the following batting ratings are notably out, much more so than the bowling and I suggest the following:

Flintoff 60ish (76)
Prior 65ish (57)
Broad 45ish (37)
Monty 25ish (40)

Bowling I would suggest Broad is too high, Hilfenhaus too low?

Anyone agree/disagree?

I agree with all of that. Plus Strauss should be more than 70, Hughes is NOT better than Katich!! That's disastrous. Bopara's 43 for bowling is ridiculous.

 

[kersnort]

Anderson is a bit over rated, Flintoff's batting is way too high and priors is way to low. Monty's bowling is a bit low also

 

[dajesmac]

Anderson is a bit over rated, Flintoff's batting is way too high and priors is way to low. Monty's bowling is a bit low also

Agree with all of that also.

 

[Collingwood50]

Well, I mean Flintoff's batting is clearly better than Collingwood's, Cooks and Hussey's.

Poor Collingwood, He is always underated perhaps this is just a clever ploy by the developers. Perhaps after the first test where he stays in for 4 days after higher rated batsman loose their wicket cheaply and then his rating changes to 100!

still, we can change them so who cares?

Monty's batting makes me lol though, who possibly justified that decision?

Heres what I will change them too

A Strauss - 72/5
A Cook - 70/5
R Bopara - 65/40
K Pietersen - 78/50
P Collingwood - 74/60
M Prior - 68/WK
A Flintoff - 57/82
S Broad - 48/76
G Swann - 47/74
J Anderson - 39/82
M Panaser - 1/72

As for the convicts...


P Hughes - 72/5
S Katich - 74/50
R Ponting - 85/40
M Hussey - 75/40
M Clarke - 79/56
M North - 68/57
B Haddin - 69/WK
M Johnson - 58/79
N Hauritz - 30/65
P Siddle - 29/78
B Hilfenhaus - 25/72

 

[kersnort]

Well, I mean Flintoff's batting is clearly better than Collingwood's, Cooks and Hussey's.

Poor Collingwood, He is always underated perhaps this is just a clever ploy by the developers. Perhaps after the first test where he stays in for 4 days after higher rated batsman loose their wicket cheaply and then his rating changes to 100!

still, we can change them so who cares?

Monty's batting makes me lol though, who possibly justified that decision?

Heres what I will change them too

A Strauss - 72/5
A Cook - 70/5
R Bopara - 65/40
K Pietersen - 78/50
P Collingwood - 74/60
M Prior - 68/WK
A Flintoff - 57/82
S Broad - 48/76
G Swann - 47/74
J Anderson - 39/82
M Panaser - 1/72

As for the convicts...


P Hughes - 72/5
S Katich - 74/50
R Ponting - 85/40
M Hussey - 75/40
M Clarke - 79/56
M North - 68/57
B Haddin - 69/WK
M Johnson - 58/79
N Hauritz - 30/65
P Siddle - 29/78
B Hilfenhaus - 25/72

Haha convicts lol, i still rekon that Hussey is just as good if not better than Michael Clarke

 

[rlfan82]

Panesar 1? - Damn you, he's a legend.

 

[Collingwood50]

Was a joke buddy