3 formats: 3 teams (What If?)

Viper.

International Cricketer
SRH...
Perth Scorchers
Joined
Apr 15, 2021
Location
India
Profile Flag
Netherlands
Online Cricket Games Owned
  1. Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Steam PC
This is one of my favorite cricket experiments or so called theoretical and hypothetical write-up scenarios. The idea comes from the 2020 pandemic cricket era, when we saw England field two different squads for their red-ball and white-ball assignments when cricket was played behind closed doors within bubbles. I tried to extend that further to 3 individual formats being played at a time as a possible scenario, and how today's international sides would line up in each of the 3 formats if they were happening simultaneously- the golden rule being that no player, obviously, can play more than 1 format. So the goal is to make 3 XIs (or squads) as strong as possible for each format utilising each player only once and using players for formats in such a way that there is balance across all the teams. So no real "red ball" priority though naturally it would be considered more important.

Starting from the second post in thread
 

1) South Africa :saf:

No better team to start this series with than the reigning test champions- The Proteas.

Tests​

1750945027765.png

Being the World Champions now, Tests have been South Africa's strongest format for a while now, rankings as well as form suggests this.​

1. :saf: :bat: Aiden Markram - Would have considered shifting him to any of the white-ball teams for balance and captaincy, but after his performance in the WTC Final, he is a must-have in the test squad as opener.
2. :saf: :wkb: Ryan Rickelton - Rickelton is another all-format star but again should be retained in the Test Team to preserve a full-strength opening pair. Mainly because of the lack of experienced openers otherwise, who wouldn't be better picks for other formats anyway.
3. :saf: :bat: Zubayr Hamza - Now at 3 we have someone from outside the regular test set-up. However Hamza has been in and around the Test Squad and averages 46 in domestic. With Stubbs far more valuable in the white-ball unit, he will be batting 3 here
4. :saf: :bat: Temba Bavuma :c: - It is a no-brainer that Bavuma makes the test squad, for only ODI could even pose an argument but he is still miles ahead in red-ball cricket. Captain as well.
5. :saf: :bat: David Bedingham - Plays only tests, so he is the sure-shot number 5 in this team, retained from the main squad.
6. :saf: :wk: Kyle Verreynne - Again he is only a regular in test cricket, and no reason to change the regular test wicket keeper when he isn't so valuable in other formats.
7. :saf: :ar: Wiaan Mulder - Mulder's best format would be red-ball too, so he is retained at Number 7 here as the all-rounder.
8. :saf: :ar: Marco Jansen - While Jansen is another all-format star for SA, his test numbers are far superior to the white-ball formats, and he is a much better red ball bowler too. So with so many other options for the LOIs, makes complete sense to retain him here.
9. :saf: :bwl: Keshav Maharaj - Maharaj is the same case yet again, but is most valuable in tests. Without him, the team loses its lead spinner, which can be made up for far better in white-ball.
10. :saf: :bwl: Kagiso Rabada - Rabada is a world class bowler across formats, but I mean why would you not have him in the test side?
11. :saf: :bwl: Dane Paterson - Probably not the best option for the third quick in all scenarios, but for now, with our constraints- Paterson has more than done the job in Tests and it is his only format, so I will be keeping him here.

12. :saf: :bat: Jordan Hermann - The top scorer in domestic FC competition, and probably a very good backup
13. :saf: :ar: Neil Brand - was part of that second-string test side against NZ, played quite well
14. :saf: :ar: Corbin Bosch - Adds more strength to the test pace bowling options, won't be required in other formats
15. :saf: :bwl: Dane Piedt - Backup spinner, plays only tests

So the Test Side looks strong, having retained most of its core as the most important format. Hamza and Paterson however will be interesting to see, and should work good.​



ODIs​

1750946676773.png

With the test team done, now with the left-overs, we look at South Africa's ODI team with the best possible balance.
1. :saf: :bat: Tony de Zorzi - Backup batsman in Tests, De Zorzi was pushed out by Rickelton from the main XI, but ODIs remain his strongest format. He made a strong statement as the successor to de Kock against India in his debut series, and will be our opener number 1 here.
2. :saf: :wk: Matthew Breetzke - Our second opener is the man who scored 150 on ODI debut, right before the Champions Trophy. Breetzke is good in T20s, but he had quite a strong start to his ODI career and he is more required here. Keeps wicket too
3. :saf: :ar: Jason Smith - At No. 3 we have a fringe player in Jason Smith, he has played all of 4 international games but 3 of them were ODIs. He played against Ireland in 2024, and scored a 91 in one of the games, which makes this his "strongest" format technically, and he fills the hole here.
4. :saf: :bat: Rassie van der Dussen :c: - Finally to pack some experience into the ODI team, who else but Rassie- it is clearly his best format, the one he has never been dropped from since his debut. He will be my captain here, and be the leading batter in the top order.
5. :saf: :wkb: Tristan Stubbs - Normally I would have him in the T20 side but based on requirements, and the player pool available, Stubbs will be making our ODI team. He has had a great start to his one-day career and is very good in List A, and is one of the best options left for this spot for the ODI side, so.
6. :saf: :bat: David Miller - Another player being a toss-up between white-ball sides, but solely based on the pool available for both formats, we shift Miller here. Again, one of the few very experienced ODI players left to pick, and will be the finisher as well, with Klaasen retired.
7. :saf: :ar: Andile Phehlukwayo - He's always been decent in the 50-over format, and with Mulder & Bosch in the test squad he should ideally be the No.7 all-rounder here. Works better than for T20I as well.
8. :saf: :bwl: Gerald Coetzee - Would've considered him for the test team but he's quite raw there, while in ODIs he has beastly numbers and had a brilliant World Cup too, making it his best format.
9. :saf: :bwl: Lungi Ngidi - Definitely could've been in any of the 3 sides, but Lungi's a better white-ball bowler, and between T20s and ODIs he's been better in the 50-over format of late. And also adds experience and leadership to the ODI attack.
10. :saf: :bwl: Lizaad Williams - Our fourth pacer here is another fringe quick, and his ODI numbers have been quite solid compared to T20I with 16 wickets in 7 games- which is my reason to have him here with Coetzee and Ngidi.
11. :saf: :bwl: Tabraiz Shamsi - Shamsi will always be known as the one who topped the T20I bowling rankings, but his ODI numbers are more than solid. With the other white-ball spinners not experienced enough in ODIs, Shamsi should lead the spin unit here.

12. :saf: :bat: Janneman Malan - Used to be good enough for the full-strength ODI team but fell off, but could be a decent backup. Looked up that he's done decently in the domestic one-day cup recently.
13. :saf: :ar: Senuran Muthusamy - Backup spinner + AR for the one-day team, he played in the NZ-PAK tri series recently and could be a useful backup to Shamsi.
14. :saf: :ar: Mihlali Mpongwana - has been around the A side and even named in the senior team, I haven't seen much of him but could be the quality pick for a backup pace AR
15. :saf: :bwl: Kwena Maphaka - Honestly he's too raw to have a best format but it makes sense to have him here as he's played some ODIs and was good in the U-19 comp which was List A.

Probably the best ODI side possible, leaving the T20 specialists to the shortest format. Bowling looks pretty good, top order is a little inexperienced but has the right guys for the ODI format.​



T20Is​

1750947901874.png

We finally move onto the shortest format, the T20Is. The SA20 has added great depth for this team, and let's look at our options.
1. :saf: :wk: Quinton de Kock :c: - Technically not retired in the T20I format and yeah in that sense a no-brainer pick. Also relieves the headache of searching for some fringe players again. It's the only format he plays, so it's what he makes it in. Valuable as ever, please captain too thanks.
2. :saf: :bat: Reeza Hendricks - Honestly it's easily his best format, or his only good format. Reeza would be my 1st pick for the T20I side as I'm never picking him for the other two formats. This way we have the old full-strength T20I opening pair opening for us in this side.
3. :saf: :bat: Lhuan-dre Pretorius - Another opener, but demoted to retain our "old" regular opening duo. Can switch with Reeza, I know he's uncapped, but we know he had an insane SA20- he's now on the radar, expect to make his debut. Based on SA20, having him here.
4. :saf: :ar: Dewald Brevis - In at 4, we have Brevis, who has become comfortable to the shortest format. Did well for CSK, has been doing well in T20s now in the middle-order, so he will be my 4.
5. :saf: :ar: Donovan Ferreira - Can only really justify his selection in this format, having not played the others. He inspires confidence though, a 4-D player giving Duminy vibes bowling the 2-3 overs of spin and playing attacking cricket. Should bat below Brevis though
6. :saf: :ar: Patrick Kruger - Has played only T20Is and has been decent as a specialist. Going with him mainly cause he has the international experience and has done well for SEC in the SA20 and fits well at No. 6 as a batting allrounder.
7.. :saf: :ar: George Linde - Honestly a very under-utilised cricketer, going with him here mainly because it's the one format he has recently made a comeback in + the fact that only in the shortest format can we really afford to play two ARs at 6 and 7. Linde fits well here, he has done well in T20Is and gives a spin option too, with our two best white-ball spinners used up in other formats.
8. :saf: :bwl: Bjorn Fortuin - Fortuin is mainly here to balance the order, making me go with him at 8 over Peter or any fast bowler to ensure a tail that isn't too long. He's a decent white ball spinner and should pair up with Linde here, and is definitely rated the better gun by CSA at least.
9. :saf: :bwl: Anrich Nortje - Honestly he would be so valuable in Tests but realistically today this is his format to play. Should be the spearhead for the T20 attack with Rabada & Ngidi elsewhere, and fair to say it his best format too internationally, and the one he will be playing mostly for SA now onwards.
10. :saf: :bwl: Nandre Burger - Another hot option for tests but like Coetzee, he is quite raw there, while in T20s he's proved to be very good for Rajasthan Royals and could add a dimension to our T20I pace attack.
11. :saf: :bwl: Ottneil Baartman - T20 specialist death bowler so a shoe-in to this side, has done well in the shortest format and I've no idea of his capabilities in the other two.

12. :saf: :bat: Rubin Hermann- Recently selected for the T20I series in Zimbabwe so I'm lazily picking him as my backup bat.
13. :saf: :ar: Delano Potgieter - I'd be pushing for him over Kruger but his disadvantage is that he's actually not capped yet, but should be soon, a very good T20 AR.
14. :saf: :ar: Andile Simelane - Has been around the T20 side as a pacer and will be my backup option here, not really played other formats
15. :saf: :bwl: Nqaba Peter- Fortuin playing pushes Peter to the bench but he will definitely be in the team as backup spinner, has played a decent amount of late.

SA20 made this a lot easier, still mostly just a mix of the specialist players- Klaasen retiring hurt the options, but still got a strong opening pair and a great all-round core.


45 players was not so hard, SA have a decent amount of depth. All teams look solid honestly, and the point of maintaining balance has been achieved across sides.
 
Can't wait for how you'd figure out Ireland :D
I've never actually done Ireland in all of the times ive excel-sheeted this, in fact I dont think Ive done Bangladesh, will be interesting
 

2) :aus: Australia​

The test runners-up are going through kind of a transition period and it will be interesting to see how theirs turns out.

Tests​

1751611910830.png

Tests could also be reasoned as Australia's best format, but it's tough since they are good at everything. But it's certainly their biggest priority, and one that is transitioning right now.
1. :aus: :bat: Usman Khawaja - This is the only format he plays now and although under a considerable rut of form, we have 45 players to fill and thus he is more than good enough to be in the Test team. He adds seniority and experience to the opening pair as well in a period of transition
2. :aus: :bat: Sam Konstas - The more exciting but less experienced half of this opening pair. Konstas has shown potential across formats domestically but has only kicked off in Tests for Australia, and as the next in-line opener he finds his place here. So more or less the regular opening pair.
3. :aus: :ar: Nathan McSweeney - Just like for SA, we have a rookie at the 3 spot. With Marnus dropped from Tests and Australia yet to find a good enough No. 3 replacement, we shoe in McSweeney here who, though has been decent across formats domestically, has again excelled mainly in and made his international debut only in red-ball. But he will not open, fortunately.
4. :aus: :bat: Steve Smith - The man who carries this lineup, and with retirement in ODIs, it's a no-brainer he makes this team but let's be honest, even without it he is. Tests are his best format by miles and he is the best of the test format too.
5. :aus: :ar: Cameron Green - A toss up between him and Head, but ultimately Green has proved more in red-ball cricket, and with Head's recent rut of scores in Tests compared to LOIs, this decision was easier to make. At his comfortable spot at 5, he is a far better player than he has shown recently.
6. :aus: :ar: Beau Webster - This spot was easy to fill, Webster has only played tests and gotten off to a great start as well, so there's evidently no challenge from any of the other formats. He's also the regular No. 6 now.
7. :aus: :wkb: Alex Carey - I would not say Carey's best format is test cricket, but it's ideal to go with the regular keeper who's also the superior glovesman. Only Inglis was there as another option anyway, and he's surely better off in white-ball.
8. :aus: :bwl: Pat Cummins :c: - The regular skipper will lead the test team as usual as it is his by truckloads his best format; even if we don't prioritise tests to have the best attack, Cummins would walk into tests first- he is far superior in this than white-ball, and this is where he is actually quite world class.
9. :aus: :bwl: Nathan Lyon - Lyon is the frontline Test spinner and doesn't play other formats, so it is another regular spot that gets filled without any debate.
10. :aus: :bwl: Josh Hazlewood - Hazlewood is quite the all-format fast bowler, but he has always been best at tests, in my opinion, as it has been the format he has been excellent at for longest, and we try to retain as much of the full-strength attack as possible, and I rate him over Starc. And we have enough depth for other format attacks.
11. :aus: :bwl: Scott Boland - At least in this universe, ScoBo finally gets his nod into the XI, as I decide to sacrifice Starc who I do feel isn't the best at tests over all formats. And I only could do this easily because Boland is just so good and the attack feels just as strong thanks to his quality. Would be harsh if even here he had to be benched as he doesn't play LOIs either.

12. :aus: :bat: Marcus Harris - Backup bat, the only one who's been around the test side as long and doesn't crack other teams. Let's hope the others play well enough though.
13. :aus: :ar: Michael Neser - I do rate Neser in other formats but he hasn't played for Australia much there, and in tests he has been great- but sadly he has to be the backup quick as Boland is just better, but he has got a better shot of playing here.
14. :aus: :bwl: Fergus O'Neill - Not someone from Australia's set-up, but he has just been so good in FC Cricket that I wanted to include him in the 45, helps have other options for LOIs too.
15. :aus: :bwl: Todd Murphy - Ultimately Lyon's successor as the off-break bowler, and as a test specialist gets the strategic nod over Kuhnemann.

Just like South Africa, we have managed to snag most of the core back. The No. 3 is inexperienced but even full-strength Australia is struggling for that atm, and only Head is a proper miss. Boland does the job well enough to ensure this is a full-strength attack too.


ODIs​

1751613628357.png

Australia are the current World Champions in the format, but have lost three big names to retirements recently. So what will be their best team with what we have left??
1. :aus: :bat: Travis Head - omitting him from the Test side is precisely for strengthening this ODI lineup, with Head at the top like the full-strength one. I would also argue this is his best format, so not much of a tough call to make.
2. :aus: :ar: Mitchell Marsh :c: - Marsh is definitely amazing at T20Is, but with the amount of depth we have for the shortest format compared to this (remember the retired ODI players still play T20Is), it was better to have him here. He's almost equally good at both formats of late anyway. Now we have managed to retain the full-strength ODI opening pair too, which is brilliant.
3. :aus: :bat: Matt Renshaw - At no. 3 here we have another gamble but Renshaw has been in top form in the List A competition that he HAD to be in this side. McSweeney being in the Test outfit contributed to this too, and I feel though they could be swapped, Renners' 50 over form needs to be given the weightage.
4. :aus: :bat: Marnus Labuschagne - Dropped from the tests, Marnus makes his way into the 50-over side, actually a great thing for the ODI team to have more experience. He's been much better in ODIs of late, after making a comeback into the side in the World Cup. Fits properly at 4 here.
5. :aus: :wkb: Peter Handscomb - Might be a bit of a bias from me here- but I rate Handscomb in ODIs, the 2019 nostalgia is a big reason, but he was very very good if I remember, and I think he is the best option for a keeper who can bat in the middle-order with Inglis left out for the shortest format.
6. :aus: :ar: Cooper Connolly - He is a very promising talent and though there isn't much to differentiate his claim to be in either of the white-ball sides, I am again considering the balance and throwing him here- because likely he'd be benched in the T20I side based on who we have. He has a composed batting mindset which I do think is better suited for ODIs anyway, and he has a future in the format. + the second spin option.
7. :aus: :ar: Aaron Hardie - I definitely consider him a T20 player more but for the sake of balance we have him here. The skill difference isn't huge, he's played ODIs too so it isn't much of a big deal when he is yet to prove much in either format. Provides the Pace AR option that Australia usually have in their XIs.
8. :aus: :bwl: Mitchell Starc - ODIs still have to be Starc's best format after all these years, even above tests. With how good Boland is, it gives us flexibility to play Starc in this team, adding some solid experience, and also because I do truly believe it his where he is best.
9. :aus: :bwl: Xavier Bartlett - Bartlett had an insane start to his ODI career and just didn't play again, but 8 wickets in 2 games is quite the way to kick it off. He should be among the top choices for the next in-line quicks in both formats but I believe he is better suited in this side than the T20I one.
10. :aus: :bwl: Jhye Richardson - Richardson if he is actually fit is a gun across formats, but the test attack is pretty much occupied and he's far too good for the Bench there; and he hasn't particularly impressed in T20Is. However he has very promising ODI stats and was very good when he actually played the format, so I think this is his best format so far.
11. :aus: :bwl: Adam Zampa - Zampa is the lead spinner in both white-ball formats, but arguably deserves to be in this side for two reasons. 1. He is ultimately better in ODIs, 2. The T20Is have more spin depth to afford having him elsewhere, compared to ODIs. Him and Starc make sure we have retained half of the full-strength attack anyway.

12. :aus: :wkb: Josh Philippe - The backup bat + wk, felt Handscomb is better at No. 5 so he was preferred ahead, but Philippe is quite good too. It was between him or McDermott.
13. :aus: :ar: Will Sutherland - He played a few ODIs recently and is pretty good across formats domestically, but based on his international experience I'll have him as my backup all-rounder here.
14. :aus: :bwl: Lance Morris - Morris is exciting and probably better in red-ball cricket but he has shown he can do well in LOIs too and has made his ODI debut as well. With enough pacers in the test side, he finds himself here.
15. :aus: :bwl: Matt Kuhnemann - Picking Murphy as the test backup spinner means Kuhnemann can fill the void in ODIs. Well unlike Murphy he has actually played ODIs and done surprisingly well in his short career, so it would obviously be better for balance to keep him here.

The ODI side is certainly not full-strength but considering recent retirements, it might not be far off. The openers are perfect; the bowling lacks two important quicks of course but I feel X and Jhye are very good replacements. Most of these guys will play ODIs in the upcoming run to the WC anyway, I believe.


T20Is​

1751615050734.png

Finally we move to the T20Is, with the remaining crop of players. A few players being T20I specialists will help us here, but let's see what we have.
1. :aus: :ar: Mitchell Owen - Owen had a crazy BBL and is currently lighting up the MLC, and has gotten his maiden T20I call-up too. So it's a no-brainer that if he has to play in some format it is here, as he is also making a strong case for the future T20I opener.
2. :aus: :ar: Matthew Short - Short has had experience across both white-ball formats and not proved much in either, but I ultimately feel he is better off in T20Is. He has had some crazy BBL seasons on pitches that "suit" him, and also with no top-order spots in the ODI side, it was easier moving Hardie/Cooper there to accommodate him here.
3. :aus: :bat: Jake Fraser-McGurk - McGurk has been a bit of a failure internationally but is currently doing well in MLC; based on our options he is a decent choice for the No.3 spot here, which I feel he is better suited to than opening. This is the one format I do have hope in him based on his play-style anyway, keep him out of the ODIs.
4. :aus: :ar: Glenn Maxwell :c: - A massive boost to this young and raw T20I side is Maxwell, who will also be the captain. Even usually I would have no doubts about going for him in the T20I team as it easily his best format, but the guy has retired from ODIs anyway, so this is literally a no-brainer.
5. :aus: :wkb: Josh Inglis - Inglis has performed across formats for Australia now and would be a good addition to any format but T20Is I still believe is his forte, the one where he has proven the most, and the one which gave him life in the Australian Team. Thanks to Pete in the ODI side, I think I can go with him in his best format.
6. :aus: :ar: Marcus Stoinis - Stoinis is another experienced campaigner adding power to this team, and just like Maxi, he also retired from ODIs making this a no-brainer call. And even more so like Maxi, this is his best format, and less so like Maxi, this is his only actually good format, so it was gonna be the same decision anyway.
7. :aus: :bat: Tim David - A proper T20I specialist who doesn't even play ODIs, David is one of a kind but that makes it an easy call to have him as one of the first names in this team, and with Maxi and Stoinis we get to retain the bulk of the full-strength middle-order, with our specialist finisher at his best here at 7.
8. :aus: :ar: Nathan Ellis - Ellis has grown into Australia's best fast bowler outside of our Big 3, and has been pretty good across white-ball formats. He is probably the 4th best pacer in both LOI formats, But I still think he is much much more valuable in T20Is, to the extent that I would start him in the full-strength T20I side. Preferring Big X and Jhye more in ODIs as of now, Ellis in T20Is is the way to go.
9. :aus: :bwl: Spencer Johnson - Another bowler from the new crop of white-ball quicks, Spencer has also played both LOI formats but is another one who I feel is far superior in T20Is. He has been excellent in BBL seasons over the years and I feel is very T20-coded, so I rate him far more in this format.
10. :aus: :bwl: Jason Behrendorff - I might again have a bit bias here, but the man was golden arm in the most recent BBL season and was very good for Australia when he last played a T20I. I used to initially rate him more in ODIs in the 2019 era, but that's long gone- he is one of the best powerplay bowlers in T20s for Australia now.
11. :aus: :bwl; Tanveer Sangha - Sangha has played a decent amount of T20Is and has done pretty well, such that I can depend on him to make up for Zampa's absence here. He is far better a bowler than Agar, and has not proven enough in ODIs to make a case there yet, so here we are.

12. :aus: :bat: Max Bryant - I'd run out of options for backup bat and honestly would've gotten McDermott in, but Bryant had quite a sensational season in the middle-order in the BBL, and it'd be interesting to see if he gets an Aussie cap.
13. :aus: :ar: Sean Abbott - I don't really rate Abbott so much so I'll just have him as a backup. He's prolly better in ODIs but based on the options we have there I've placed him here.
14. :aus: :bwl: Ben Dwarshuis - Dwarshuis has had a pretty good time in the last year in BBL as well as for Australia- though he did a decent job in the CT which was ODI I still think that he's a proper T20 player, he literally doesn't have List A experience domestically compared to his T20 performances in the BBL which have been quite clutch with bat and ball. Could realistically have him over JB in this side to add batdeep too but for now he stays as backup.
15. :aus: :bwl: Ashton Agar - Agar still finds his way into the side as the backup spinner. He's fallen off a bit and is inferior to Sangha as a bowler but is still the best backup spin option left over with experience as well.


So the T20I side looks quite balanced as well, it lacks the regular openers but the middle-order is practically full-strength, and the bowling, in all honesty is how I feel Australia should be going forward with their T20I attack anyways by resting the Big 3.


For Australia I feel quite satisfied with the balance in all 3 sides- The test side is almost perfect, ODIs lack an experienced middle-order but has potential looking at the 2027 WC, and T20Is retain a full-strength middle order and a quality bowling with a more mercurial top-order.
 

3) India :ind:

Time to narrow down 45 players from the most populated and competitive cricket playing nation

Tests​

1751797266741.png

Currently India's weakest format, as they go through a rough period of total transition. So what would our best lineup be with even more limitations?
1. :ind: :bat: Yashasvi Jaiswal - Jaiswal has played 2 formats a decent bit for India, but has ultimately made his mark in Test Cricket more. Meanwhile he hasn't even been required in the T20I outfit of late, which by itself has a lot of specialists in the main team, so Jaiswal stays in the test team, the format where he averages 50 and is India's best bat as of now.
2. :ind: :bat: KL Rahul - Rahul also plays only 2 formats, Test & ODI but he has been ever so important in the test team in its transition period as a senior member. This isn't just me prioritising tests but both the main openers in the test team have been best at tests as of late, and ideally should stick to the red ball side. So the test side retains its main opening pair
3. :ind: :bat: Karun Nair -Has recently returned to the test side, playing one test at 6 and the other at 3. Hasn't kicked off yet but with limited options he takes the 3 spot, and we are technically retaining the full-strength team for this spot too, at least based on what's happening now.
4. :ind: :bat: Shubman Gill :c: - ODIs is undoubtedly Gill's best format by miles, but considering the circumstances, and the kind of form he is in, It's best he plays at 4 in the test team as the captain as well. India has other options for ODI openers, while he is absolutely more required here fpr balance, and has justified it too by his recent batting.
5. :ind: :wkb: Rishabh Pant - Another retention from the main test side and a no-brainer- Pant's best format has always been tests where he's been a consistent performer and the main keeper. No reason why I would select him in the white-ball team instead.
6. :ind: :bat: Sarfaraz Khan - Someone I believe was unfairly dropped from the side, after being selected only so late after years of domestic performances. He may not justify selection in the main test team of now, but in this scenario with one player per team he is my best candidate left for No. 6. And he is good.
7. :ind: :ar: Ravindra Jadeja - Another no-brainer, Jadeja plays ODIs too but he's nowhere as important there as he is here, nor is he as good in white-ball cricket either. More crucial with Ashwin retired.
8. :ind: :ar: Shardul Thakur - He was under-used and under-performed in his few overs too in the recent England test, but he is a fine red-ball cricketer, with both bat and ball, more so than in white-ball cricket where he leaks runs. With the lack of experience in the bowling and the limited options, he's one of the more senior and better players left for the test pace attack.
9. :ind: :bwl: Akash Deep - Personally he has been fine in test cricket since his debut, did decently in Australia and has done well in the 2nd test too, he's a good candidate for the main team's third pacer woes and he's also just a test specialist for India so pretty obvious pick.
10. :ind: :bwl: Kuldeep Yadav - Kuldeep is good across all formats and arguably even better in white-ball cricket but he is very crucial in this team in the current scenario, needing an attacking spinner and having lost Ashwin too. India's always had better depth in LOIs due to IPL and thus he shouldn't be missed much.
11. :ind: :bwl: Jasprit Bumrah - The back-bone of the team, who is ridiculously good in every format but in no world am I gonna pick him for white-ball, like I said, with India's depth, their needs and requirements, and the fact that Bumrah is needed to carry this attack and he's been ultimately at his best in red-ball of late.

12. :ind: :bat: Abhimanyu Easwaran - A red-ball specialist who still hasn't gotten his go for Team India, but is on the verge of selection as seen by his selection for England. He should be the best possible backup, probably a shout for the XI over Nair too.
13. :ind: :bat: Rajat Patidar - He was once called up to the squad for batting at 3 against England at home; he has quite good FC numbers and is a very good batsman, could be a good backup.
14. :ind: :ar: Tanush Kotian - He was named as Ashwin's replacement in Australia and seems to be next-in-line as a spinner to debut in tests, having done well in FC and A games. He should be the backup spinner.
15. :ind: :bwl: Anshul Kamboj - Performed in both ranji and the A games in England, is a promising red-ball quick, better to give him this spot than waste a white-ball player here.

The Test Side has fortunately retained most of it's new core following the transition period with Kohli, Rohit & Ashwin retiring. The bowling isn't exactly full strength but India haven't figured it entirely out either, and it's good that most of the Test Team is ultimately better at tests that we got to make a XI like this.


ODIs​

1751798428695.png

ODIs have been India's strong suit for sure, having won the Champions Trophy this year. Doesn't hurt that it's the one format their most senior guys still play.
1. :ind: :bat: Rohit Sharma :c: - Quite an obvious selection, as Rohit plays only ODIs now, helping us forcefully retain the best opener available. But it's arguably his best format anyway.
2. :ind: :bat: Sai Sudharsan - With Gill captaining our test team, Sai is undoubtedly the best replacement. He averages only 39 in FC, so he isn't the best candidate for the test team anyway, while he averages a whopping 60 in List A and had a great debut in ODIs too. Definitely unlucky the current team is so stacked, but in this scenario he walks in.
3. :ind: :bat: Virat Kohli - Another Rohit Sharma scenario here, and it's once again his best format. At one point he might have been too valuable for the test team, but his declining form and eventual retirement leads us here, strengthening the ODI team even more.
4. :ind: :bat: Shreyas Iyer - It's almost like India's best players in certain formats specialise in that format, cause Iyer has been the dream Number 4, and there's no hesitation retaining him here as he doesn't play either of the other formats. And he's solid.
5. :ind: :wkb: Dhruv Jurel - Might be the one weak point in this XI as Jurel has played both Tests and T20Is but yet to debut here, making this a weird pick. But I do feel he's the best wicket keeper option left with Rahul & Pant in tests, and he averages 47 odd in List A and definitely has the temperament for ODIs, can't help that the team is too stacked usually.
6. :ind: :ar: Hardik Pandya - The number of IPL specialists available for the T20I team meant we could use Pandya here, who's usually good in both LOI formats. But obviously with less experimenting in ODIs we don't have much options other than him for the 6 spot like we do in T20Is so that's the case like it usually is.
7. :ind: :ar: Axar Patel - Axar too is good across formats, but under-used in tests as of late and T20Is as we said has a lot of depth that we can afford to play him here. He's been very good as a spin AR anyway, better than Jadeja nowadays. It's also probably his best format right now.
8. :ind: :ar: Washington Sundar - Sundar's alright in each format, not great in any, in my opinion. But I'd want the attacking spinner in Kuldeep in tests and the bat-deep I require here in ODIs, so I'm deciding to use him here.
9. :ind: :bwl: Mohammed Shami - Shami would be a big boost in tests, but he hasn't exactly been preferred of late due to injuries and such. And not forgetting how insane his ODI stats are and the fact that he has gone crazy with wickets in two consecutive World Cups, safe to say this is his best format, keeping fitness also in mind.
10. :ind: :bwl: Mohammed Siraj - Siraj would also be helpful in tests but he hasn't been so great of late, except the most recent 2nd Test. But he's best in red-ball cricket when he's the lead bowler, and with Bumrah playing the "stats" do say he won't be as good. All that aside, Siraj has been very good in ODIs in his career. The CT dropping was honestly harsh, because this is his definitely where he is best.
11. :ind: :bwl: Prasidh Krishna - Krishna was quite expensive in the England tests and is not inspiring confidence to be in the test side, while his ODI record has been much better, I even remember his debut in 2021- he has always been a very good ODI bowler. I rate him in this format.

12. :ind: :bat: Ruturaj Gaikwad - Ruturaj has been very under-picked in his international career due to competition. List A is his best format, but I'd not pick him over Sai, so he's the backup bat.
13. :ind: :wkb: Ishan Kishan - Ishan has been inconsistent overall but he's had his best moments in ODIs, with a double ton to his name too. I'd pick him as backup WK, with Jurel preferred ahead at 5.
14. :ind: :bwl: Mukesh Kumar - Honestly just a scraps pick cause no better backup quick option who's played ODIs before based on my other selections. Decent backup
15. :ind: :bwl: R. Sai Kishore - This man has beastly domestic stats and needs to play international matches soon. His List A stats in particular is very good, so he can be our backup spinner here.

With Rohit & Kohli's retirements it made the ODI side forcefully much stronger, and Shreyas, Hardik & Axar are also full-strength inclusions. The bowling does lack Bumrah but otherwise I feel are the best ODI bowlers India have (pace). So we have another good side, with only a few weak-points which also has potential.


T20Is​

1751799476665.png

The reigning T20I champions have a plethora of options for this format thanks to IPL, and some specialists makes this even easier.
1. :ind: :ar: Abhishek Sharma - He's the current T20I opener for India and is doing a pretty damn good job, keeping even Gill & Jaiswal out fairly. And with them being in the test team he has no real competition and easily takes the role of opener on strike.
2. :ind: :wkb: Sanju Samson - He's the other regular opener and has really redeemed himself of late with centuries and consistent performance. Also solves the keeper conundrum. We've managed to retain our "full strength" T20I opening pair too, technically based on the recent tours as Jaiswal & Gill haven't played.
3. :ind: :bat: Tilak Varma - His IPL season was a bit mid but he was amazing in the T20Is played before batting at Number 3, such that even SKY had to come later. Another T20I specialist for India as of now, and one I really rate, a sure-shot pick for me.
4. :ind: :bat: Suryakumar Yadav :c: - The current T20I skipper is the definition of a T20 specialist and is India's best T20 player too, so it's literally the first name on the sheet, in all scenarios.
5. :ind: :ar: Shivam Dube - He hasn't exactly been regular in the T20I side recently but has definitely been in and around, and he serves as a good replacement option for Pandya. He made it to the team off good IPL seasons and was also part of the winning T20 WC team, so I think he is fine here for now.
6. :ind: :ar: Nitish Kumar Reddy - Another Pace AR seems like a rarity for India, but he has also performed well of late to crack the Indian line-up. His recent IPL was horrendous but he's someone to be backed for the future, and a possible Pandya replacement here too.
7. :ind: :bat: Rinku Singh - A no-brainer pick, for someone who plays only T20Is anyway and has been a solid example of a finisher at the death. His IPL season should be no reason to drop him as he has been consistent for India, the perfect finisher pick at Number 7.
8. :ind: :bwl: Harshit Rana - Recent inclusion in the team in the GG era after a good IPL, I really dunno how good he is in other formats but the IPL showed his worth in T20s. The IPL gives us a lot of options for this team but as one of the guys who's played a decent amount for India too recently he gets the nod.
9. :ind: :bwl: Ravi Bishnoi - He really had a horrendous IPL which would probably keep him out of India colours for now but he was quite good in T20Is before that, and as I'm emphasis international experience I will pick him here as one of the spinners, and I really like him so hopefully he gets back to form.
10. :ind: :bwl: Varun Chakravarthy - Has been very very good of late and even did well in ODIs, but T20Is are his best format and also the dilemma of batdeep made me select Sundar in the One-Day side leaving no choice but to pick Varun here. Barely a problem anyway
11. :ind: :bwl: Arshdeep Singh - Arshdeep is growing to be a senior member preferred across formats but honestly he hasn't gotten much chances to prove at all in either of the other two, while he's arguably the best T20I bowler for India at the moment with Bumrah barely playing. So he will lead our attack.

12. :ind: :wkb: Jitesh Sharma - Jitesh was incredible towards the end of the IPL for RCB, and I've gone ahead with him over Prabhsimran for backup WK cause he's actually played for India before, though it was a close call.
13. :ind:bat: Riyan Parag - Parag has also played a few LOIs recently after his good IPL in 2024 but I won't be selecting him over any of the other batters in the XI, so he'll be a backup bat. Maybe over Dube.
14. :ind:ar: Krunal Pandya - Krunal was very good for RCB and stepped up as main spinner and is also a handy all-rounder, and has decent Indian team experience, so he'll be more than good enough a backup AR+spin here.
15. :ind: :bwl: Khaleel Ahmed - Had a lot of choices for backup pacer based on the IPL so not really strict on this pick but, Khaleel has been around the national team in recent tours and was amongst the wickets in IPL too. So I really didn't get anyone better, and he's decent.

The T20I side has seriously helped with it's emphasis on specialist players, following the transition that happened in 2024 with Rohit, Kohli retiring and a lot of young stars from IPL having already impressed before it, which made it all the more competitive for selection as well. This is pretty much the best T20I side for India bar Hardik & Axar, as Bumrah doesn't play much nowadays due to fitness.


India was quite easy due to so many specialists in each format, such that I'd say nearly all 3 formats were full-strength. The bowling in Tests was probably not the best, the ODIs had inexperience at No. 5 and opening alongside Rohit, while T20Is is pretty passable for a regular Indian T20 side. Thank the IPL.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top