Have I ruined Tremlett forever?

dion

School Cricketer
Joined
Dec 3, 2006
Location
Hartlepool
Online Cricket Games Owned
becuase im in season 2010 and now he has a bowling average of 31 :crying and im worried I will do the same to my star offspinner Tim Beauchamp. In Limited Overs games Tremlett has an average of 22 and Beachaump has an average of 15 :hpraise but in FC its 31 and 25 respectivley. Do you have any idea's on how to get it back down (bowling tactics, techniques ect.) also Tremlett is 26 is there any point on me putting him on bowling technique or should I just put him on practice?
 
Allrounder18 said:
31 and 25 in first class is more than decent ,what else u are expecting them to do?

Its all about perspective, Tremlett was 26 in first clas and is now 31, thats an increase of 5! in only 3 seasons! Beachaump im not so worried about, but his average has been going up, hoever I haven't noticed it as much but since murali called it a day I have been struggeling for wickets and bond and munday ain't what I expected.
 
i find that munday has lost alot of form not working in tandem with afridi, ive got singh now, he seems to be alright as long as wickets are falling but against a settled batsman seems a bit expensive
 
boozemonster said:
i find that munday has lost alot of form not working in tandem with afridi, ive got singh now, he seems to be alright as long as wickets are falling but against a settled batsman seems a bit expensive
I don't have Afridi or singh, Mundays form aint the problem, its tremlett who can't his a cows a*** with a banjo at the moment.
 
tremlett doesnt normally play every game for me i rotate tremlett, anderson, ormond, sidebottom and a regen called cash, the game is so biased towards spinners that i dont bother with pace men much, just to open the bowling and the 2nd new ball if it gets that far.
 
I wouldn't say you have.Open him in bowling for 2 matches for the 1st innings then 3rd or 4th in the 2nd innnings and see where he prefers.

If he is still wuite young try bowling technique for the long term or Nets for the short term.
 
my views

Tremlett is generally good on the game although He can be quite expensive.

My Bowlers are:

M Munday
C Tremlett
L Plunkett
J Anderson
S Broad
G Onions
and a few youth players
 
ipitythesefools said:
Tremlett is generally good on the game although He can be quite expensive.

My Bowlers are:

M Munday
C Tremlett
L Plunkett
J Anderson
S Broad
G Onions
and a few youth players
Thats the exact oppiset for me lol, he is very economical but just doesn't take enough wickets.
(nice attack btw)
 
ipitythesefools said:
Tremlett is generally good on the game although He can be quite expensive.

My Bowlers are:

M Munday
C Tremlett
L Plunkett
J Anderson
S Broad
G Onions
and a few youth players


Flippin eck you've got well mint bowlers i got rubbish ones but they deliver well. Shahid Afridi is a good spinner but is not as good with the bat.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top