Interview with National Managers-The Answers

[voldemort]

Batting net alone gives concentration[consistency] pops
combine it with fielding or wicketkeeping it becomes faster
combine the primary with wk and field it pops the fastest

Player	Overs	Mdns	Runs	Wkts	E/R	Wd	NB

 

[Griffo]

So would two fields have the same effect as field, wk?

 

[voldemort]

no... the second fielding has no effect on secondaries...

 

[ZoraxDoom]

The assumption is that Primary+Field trains both Concentration and Consistency equally, whereas Primary+Keeping trains Concentration more. No idea if this is true. Probably the other reason is having a batsman who can keep a bit is quite useful than one who is an overly good keeper.

 

[voldemort]

primary+keeping = primary+fielding

 

[zainawan89]

bowl+field= more consistency pop and less concentration pops
bat + field= more concentraion pop and less consistency pops
only field= both concentraion and consistency increase at same rate but slower than with bat/bowl + field
only keep= both concentraion anc consistency increase at same rate but slower than if combined with a bat or bowl net.

bat/bowl + field + keep= Even faster than with only bat/bowl + field

hope tht explains it all.

 

[aussie1st]

The assumption is that Primary+Field trains both Concentration and Consistency equally, whereas Primary+Keeping trains Concentration more. No idea if this is true. Probably the other reason is having a batsman who can keep a bit is quite useful than one who is an overly good keeper.

I can tell you that's not true. For my batter the conc pop is 2 for every 1 cons pop at the very least.

 

[AussieDominance]

The assumption is that Primary+Field trains both Concentration and Consistency equally, whereas Primary+Keeping trains Concentration more. No idea if this is true. Probably the other reason is having a batsman who can keep a bit is quite useful than one who is an overly good keeper.

Not sure where you are getting it from im involved with Pakistan and have just checked up on 2 players who both had WK nets and they popped in the same times?

 

[voldemort]

he has his own theories, dont take much care abt what he says

 

[ZoraxDoom]

he has his own theories, dont take much care abt what he says

For your information, I got it off the Windies off-site a few seasons ago and never had in confirmed...

 

[Hooper]

Just read this.

Interesting to read that the green writer (I think) reckons that a strong bowling side will win you more matches then a strong batting side. So if you have a team with gun bowlers you are right. I have gun batters and average bowlers. I think Im going to have to buy some gun bowlers, because I dont have nets to train a promising youngster.

What type of team have you got? Strong batting side, strong bowling side? Or pretty allrounded?

 

[zainawan89]

Bowling side
and yeh u need bowling to win matches.
u need to get 10 wickets to win.
if u hav good batting but average bowling u cant win matches.

 

[ste_mc_efc]

strong bowling,

1 strong 1 quality (both seamers) then 1 remarkable, 1 wonderful 1 exceptional (all 3 are spinners) so on my dusty pitch i can normally take 1-2 wickets with the seamers opening (sets of 7 would try 1 of them thru id he had better stamina) then the spinners coming in an tightening up in the middle overs, picking up a couple of wickets for the collapse to come in the last 10, if they AO already

my batting can chase down about 230 against most sides, and is usually just good enough, i have 2 superb openers, wonderful no. 3, remarkable no. 4 + 5 then a proficient 6 and a respectable 7 (sometimes 8 too)

the better bowling works best if you have one superstar and an average squad around him, as if he fails on 1 ball with the bat you lose, he can get hit for several sixes but still knock a team over cheaply with the ball

 

[ste_mc_efc]

such a long post in my eagerness to avoid having to re-type it i got a bit carried away! sorry

 

[Hooper]

Huh? What? lol Its alright, prefer a long post then a one sentence one. Thanks for the feedback guys. Anyone else think the same?