sohum
Executive member
Dude, taimur, you are missing one prolific test cricketer--Virender Sehwag. Funny, since he averages something like 500 against Pakistan!
Exaggerating, but how can you forget him after this year?

ronny_kingsley said:Why not have the Pakistan eam itself for the series.
Man is this guy out of this mind when he says Kaneria and Afridi.
Also Inzamam is a good choice no doubt but not a probable one .
sohummisra said:Dude, taimur, you are missing one prolific test cricketer--Virender Sehwag. Funny, since he averages something like 500 against Pakistan! Exaggerating, but how can you forget him after this year?
ronny_kingsley said:Akhtar won Pakistan the ODI series in Australia just a few years back.Also he did well in Australia but it was just that he didnt get support in Tests.
Lara no matter how a gr8 a batsman he is has never helped WI beat Aussies in Australia which Laxman has done.
So maybe the McGrayh effect on Lara and that all Laxman would be a better choice and cant have Lara in the 14 cos you cant just have him in the 14 and not in the 11 .
Maybe most wont agree but I do
sohummisra said:Yes, at the moment Fleming seems like the ideal captain.
I'm guessing if they can fit some of the other captains into the team, Smith or Fleming may take captaincy. Probably not Smith because of the defensive mindset of the South African team. Else, I see Rahul Dravid as the main candidate for captaincy.
MWaugh said:Aktar did nothing in the tests out here just recently. He bowled well in the first test on a nice fast bouncy wicket at perth. and after that he lost all heart and packed up and went home. as for he didnt have any support, i think the real story that he gave his team no support. players like sami, kaneria and rana gave loads of support but the derailed express sat in the sheds.
when did pakistan win the ODI series in australia? they didnt get near it when they came out just the other month, they didnt win it when they came out along with india. they made the final and got convincingly thumped by australia. he didnt lead them there either. that was all razzaq. im not sure which tour you watched but i dont think it involved australia.
as for lara, there is no way possible that laxman can be put up at the same level of that of lara. as for not winning anything for windies against australia. he hit that memorable 200 in sydney. a magical 213 to lead windies to a 10 wicket win in jamaica in 99. a match saving 153* to lead his side to a 1 wicket win in the bridgetown test later that series. lara has constantly proven himself to be one of, if not, the best batsman in the world (disputable between himself, tendulkar and probably now ponting). to leave him out of the 11 to allow laxman a place is in it simplest... a joke
After seeing Flemmings tactics against australia i wouldnt call Stephen Flemming the most attacking captain in the world. I wouldnt let inzimam anywhere near it because of the way he comes across on the field. lara hasnt ever really been a GREAT captain. hes been good, but not great. i would probably look at vaughn if you can get him in the team
yes ronny it was only just recently that i came across this indoor series. the series in the middle of the australian winter and aktar wasnt leading the team, aktar played the 3rd string role behind waqar and wasim akram. its alot easier for a bowler to bowl when the pressure is off. he was a young speedster with heart - all of which seemed to have dissapeared last series. and we are talking about 1999 era. thats many years ago. when he was out recently he did sweet nothing. kaneria and rana proved the pick of the bowlers while shoab only compounded his countries problems by barely even playing.ronny_kingsley said:Silly might be the word to say the least. I assume you to be an Aussie and wonder your not knowing of Australia crumbling to a 2-1 defeat from the Pakistanis under Waquar maybe it was the Indoor series.
Also all of Lara's innings didnt do the trick downunder .only two of the contemprory batsman can boast of dismantling an Aussie atack downunder ie Laxman & Dravid .Whatever one says Laxman continues to be best against AUssies for me.
Afridi is nothing more than a slogger with a magnificent eye, he won't get anything against quality bowling- also, I'd be fascinated to know how 10 overs could give Australia "no chance of winning it"taimurasad said:*On Afridi's inclusion in ODI':; if Sehwag & Afridi stayed at the wicket for 10overs then the so called best will have no chance of winning it.
*On Kaneria:Kaneria performed brilliantly in tests in Aus this year & also against India. He is certainly a gr8 choice, the captain will certainly have to choose b/w him and Kumble.
*On Inzamam: "In Modern day cricket Inzamam is only second to Lara & Tendulkar but he never gets credit for it" ~Ian Chappel
Thats wht u r doing ronny, not giving him enough credit for his gr8ness.
brad352 said:I'd be fascinated to know how 10 overs could give Australia "no chance of winning it"