McGrath vs. Sarwan

D

Duncan

Guest
apparently mcgrath and sarwan exchanged words the other day during the test match...

they ended up laughing and wouldn't tell wat they actually said...

but the Syndey Morning Herald said they said sumthin like:

Mcgrath: dont' u eva f***** talk bout my wife again or i'll f******* break ur f****** throat up..

btw..this is not a lie
 
ppl said to hav read their lips of mcgrath saying that...

however pidgey did say he over reacted
 
how do u know that sarwan did not talk bout his wife?
i'm very surprised that glen actually said dat if dat's really wot he said!!
 
Whar happened to McGrath later? As expected he has been let off, i guess. Some ppl say aggro is a part and parcel of the game. Well, Virender Sehwag was banned for a match for "excessive appealing" by the infamous Mike Deness. I guess appealing is not a part and parcel of the game, but sledging is?
 
I think any bad/racist language or personal insults directed at a player or an umpire should be frowned upon and players should be punished for it. Swearing when you've made a mistake is fine, I think.

I think the rules on appealing should be looked at. Sehwag wasn't even involved in the dismissal. I think appealing should be limited to the bowler, the captain and any fielder involved in the dismissal, wether that be a catch or a run out.
 
My mistake, but still, he did over react. The laws only require a player to make some sort of noise to signify "is that out?" Screaming at the top of your voice is a bit over the top.
 
McGrath was pointing fingers at Sarwan's face, shouting abuses and insults ( well that cant be proved, but he wasnt saying good morning either) I think that that is over the top too. Another incident, where Slater thot he took a catch. The 3rd umpire ruled in batsman's favour. Slater was swearing at the batsman, he went near the umpire and challenged the decision. Now that is over appealing, and he was let off.
Pollock screamed his lungs off to the same umpire to whom sehwag appealed and he made the umpire give a wrong decision under his influence. pollock was let off too.
 
This is the thing.

We don't want players saying to each other "Good Morning mate, isn't it a lovely day today" at the start of the play. We don't want bowlers saying "What a great shot my friend" when they're hit for six. We don't want players having to walk up to the umpire, tap him on the shoulder and say "Excuse me sir, but I think that was out, what do you think?"

But we don't want players shouting, screaming and swearing. We don't want to get to the situations they occaisonally have in baseball when you end up with players and coaches screaming in the umpires faces because they disagree with him.

But we do want a happy medium.
 
apparently...malcolm speed wants more action 4 this event....he said the umpirse should hav dun sumthin

Speed: Umpires should have disciplined McGrath and Sarwan
Wisden CricInfo staff - 21 May 2003


Malcolm Speed, chief executive of the International Cricket Council (ICC), has stated that the umpires were wrong in failing to lay disciplinary charges following the controversial clash between Glenn McGrath and Ramnaresh Sarwan on the fourth day of the Antigua Test.

Umpires David Shepherd of England and India's Srinivas Venkataraghavan, described by Speed as "very experienced" officials took no action following the heated exchange between the pair. "Our view was that the series was played in a good spirit," Speed told reporters. "Our view was that in one incident, possibly another incident, charges should have been laid."

This was not the first time Steve Waugh's Australian side had been involved in such controversy, and Speed added: "This Australia team is one of the greatest teams we've seen in cricket. It would be a shame if it was remembered as a badly behaved team."

Speed said leading umpires had been told of their responsibility to lay charges where appropriate under a new disciplinary code at a meeting in Dubai last month. Under the new system it is the responsibility of the three umpires to bring charges before the match referee. Under the previous system the match referee acted as both prosecutor and judge.

Asked whether he would look to take action, Speed said there was nothing that he could do. "I only have the power to lay a charge within 24 hours" [of an incident happening]." He explained that the ICC board was looking at ways of giving him "greater latitude" in disciplinary matters. "Players make mistakes. Umpires make mistakes. We don't want the umpires to over-react," Speed insisted. "And if the on-field umpires haven't seen an incident there is nothing to stop the third umpire laying a charge."
 
Hey is wad my local news paper said on 22nd may.


Behaviour of Aussies is cause for concern
Melbourne, May '21:
International Cricket Council president Malcolm Gray has ordered a review into the behaviour of Australia's cricketers during their recent Test series with the West Indies.
Gray said the ICC wanted to take a first look at some of the incidents that marred the tour. particularly the on-field row between Australian quick bowler Glenn McGrath and West Indies batsman and vice-captain Ramnaresh Sarwan during the fourth Test.
"From all of the reports we got it appearerd. ?.that the behaviour of the players was quite over the odds," Gray told reporters in Melbourne on Wednesday.
Gray, who is an Australian national, said Australia's players had a bad reputation in the cricket community after years of on-field rows and accusations of sledging.
"Australians are not liked around the world," Gray added.
"The messages we were getting was that the Australian public and the Australian press felt it was way over the top... this time the Australian people believed the actions were beyond the pale," the ICC president said. (Reuters) '
 
Originally posted by Insha@May 26 2003, 02:58 PM
"Australians are not liked around the world," Gray added.
since when did da world not like australia??? :angry:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top