Stunning Graphics in Cricket 2002 & 2004

barmyarmy

Retired Administrator
Joined
Mar 12, 2003
Location
Edinburgh
Originally posted by andrew_nixon79@Nov 3 2003, 09:38 PM
I'd say XP Professional was better than 98 SE. XP Home isn't really that good.
What are the main differences between XP home and pro?
 

andrew_nixon

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Location
Huddersfield, Englan
Online Cricket Games Owned
I'm not sure on the exact technical differences, but Pro seems to be a lot more stable than Home. It's designed primarily for the businees environment and hence, it has to be more stable. I've been using it for just over a year now, and I haven't had a single crash. (Apart from those caused by the lethal combination of Cricket 2002 and my GeForce4 graphics card :D )
 
R

rasi

Guest
Originally posted by barmyarmy+Nov 4 2003, 03:24 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(barmyarmy @ Nov 4 2003, 03:24 AM)</div>
<!--QuoteBegin-andrew_nixon79
@Nov 3 2003, 09:38 PM
I'd say XP Professional was better than 98 SE. XP Home isn't really that good.
What are the main differences between XP home and pro? [/b]
I have had both XP home and XP Pro, but XP Home seems to eat up quite a lot of resources than the Pro version. And as Andrew stated the stability factor is missing, plus that XP Home has some compatibility issues, not to mention the security bugs. :lol: :lol:

So, the Pro version is way better than XP Home.
 
N

nikhilverma

Guest
Originally posted by andrew_nixon79@Nov 3 2003, 11:00 PM
Windows ME is the worst version of Windows. It has a ridiculous amount of compatibility errors, and crashes even more than 95.
don't say that andrew my computer rens much faster after installation of win me....
:angry:

and it has never had any serious problems as well.......
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top