Survival of Cricket in Sri Lanka| The Colombo Incident...

[Muzammil.]

The topic Survival of cricket in Sri Lank, it doesn't means that Srilankan team will get banned for International Cricket. Yes, maybe Sri Lankan Grounds get banned for International Cricket.

The Incident of Colombo took place at 19 June 2015. And the background is the spectators threw stones on the field, and the two groups, the supporters of the each team had some fight. Luckily no player was hurt. though, a question........... the attack on Lankan team in '09 in Lahore was out side the stadium, showing it was secured in the ground, but now the incident at colombo is inside the stadium, which is more dangerous the the out side...
So was it a reaction of attack in Lahore? I Don't thinks,,,
Certainly it was the result that Sri Lanka was losing the game? Yes ofcourse.

So, there are few chances of death of international cricket in Lanka, because the players were not hit, and especially ammo was not used. So hoping that the cricket stays in this Island, is not any thing that can not be hoped, or not the thing that its possible to ban.
So after all ,ears and the eyes on ICC statements, reaction of PCB and the Cricket Sri Lanka.

 

[Markkkkk]

Didnt read after the first sentences attempt at spelling 'cricket'...

 

[Muzammil.]

Didnt read after the first sentences attempt at spelling 'cricket'...

Thanks for correction

 

[PokerAce]

The topic Survival of cricket in Sri Lank, it doesn't means that Srilankan team will get banned for International Cricket. Yes, maybe Sri Lankan Grounds get banned for International Cricket.

The Incident of Colombo took place at 19 June 2015. And the background is the spectators threw stones on the field, and the two groups, the supporters of the each team had some fight. Luckily no player was hurt. though, a question........... the attack on Lankan team in '09 in Lahore was out side the stadium, showing it was secured in the ground, but now the incident at colombo is inside the stadium, which is more dangerous the the out side...
So was it a reaction of attack in Lahore? I Don't thinks,,,
Certainly it was the result that Sri Lanka was losing the game? Yes ofcourse.

So, there are few chances of death of international cricket in Lanka, because the players were not hit, and especially ammo was not used. So hoping that the cricket stays in this Island, is not any thing that can not be hoped, or not the thing that its possible to ban.
So after all ,ears and the eyes on ICC statements, reaction of PCB and the Cricket Sri Lanka.

To Sum Up -

Ban SL Team - No

Ban Colombo Ground - Probably

Which is a more dangerous attack - Are you kidding ... stones being thrown at you or terrorists shooting at you with AK-47s, while you are a sitting duck in an open area. Clearly the latter. Why is this even a question for you.

 

[Muzammil.]

To Sum Up -

Ban SL Team - No

Ban Colombo Ground - Probably

Which is a more dangerous attack - Are you kidding ... stones being thrown at you or terrorists shooting at you with AK-47s, while you are a sitting duck in an open area. Clearly the latter. Why is this even a question for you.

You are right on your question. First tell the the stone was an opening for weopn or Ak-47. In the same way, if those people who were not armed threw stones, then how would you not expect the terrorists opens up fire with even more dangerous weapon the Ak-47. Becuase no one can say about particular place where the terrorists lives
Thowing stones was an opening, and the end if not controlled can be even more frustrating...

 

[PokerAce]

You are right on your question. First tell the the stone was an opening for weopn or Ak-47. In the same way, if those people who were not armed threw stones, then how would you not expect the terrorists opens up fire with even more dangerous weapon the Ak-47. Becuase no one can say about particular place where the terrorists lives
Thowing stones was an opening, and the end if not controlled can be even more frustrating...

Look its one thing to have an opening in a stadium where a guy can throw stones or bottles or whatever, but another thing entirely to have an opening in the middle of a large city where a bunch of guys can just show with AK-47s no questions asked and then start shooting.

Of course ideally neither should happen, but is there any question as to which is the one that is more alarming.

I don't understand why you are even trying to argue here.

 

[Satan666]

Meh Indians burnt a field in the '96 world cup and no repercussions.

 

[Aalay]

Meh Indians burnt a field in the '96 world cup and no repercussions.

Meh and you think people would learn 19 years later but they still haven't. Especially after they have been in the receiving end in 96 and knows what it's all like.

 

[StinkyBoHoon]

this is a mad line of reasoning, should sri lanka face sanctions in the way of a fine? should the stadium serve some sort of ban? yeah, probably.

should we treat this incident like an act of political terrorism? er no.

 

[Muzammil.]

this is a mad line of reasoning, should sri lanka face sanctions in the way of a fine? should the stadium serve some sort of ban? yeah, probably.

should we treat this incident like an act of political terrorism? er no.

Ye, that was not a big incident, the news channels gave the news of attack on players, but it was the fight between some people.... So 99% Cricket Stays here, and maybe 01% it quits

 

[PokerAce]

^ Pls get over it man, u are way over-reacting. SL is not going to get banned because of some crowd trouble during a match.

The whole idea is preposterous to begin with.