Is winning more important than letting the active players in? I thought the motive of Cricsim was just to have fun as its no real game, but I was wrong. I think here winning = enjoyment No problem with that KX, who doesn't likes to win so really there's no hard thoughts for you. And talking about performance, if you see the last game I played, I took 4 wickets and yet was dropped, so better not use the word performance
^^DPRA just got a century and name one manager in cricsim who would replace a pure bowler or pure batsman with a bowling allrounder. I dropped you simply because we had less batsman.
I recommend you change styles Aamir. All-rounders aren't usually too effective, so I'm surprised DPRA got a ton. Lots of people like being them cus there fun, but it's rarer to perform and hence some teams will refuse to play an all-rounder and if you do its a max of 1 really.
We had too many all-rounders when I joined like I think I might have said.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.