Precambrian
International Cricketer
Hayden faced them all in domestic competition and hammered them all. He hammered Steyn numerous times around the ground before getting caught at short cover.
Load of crap. Hayden "smashed" Steyn around? :laugh, If that is the case, why did he have to retire at the end of that series??

Four of them. The only hundreds that Hayden hasn't made where the ball hasn't been swinging or seaming have been in the subcontient.
Lolwut? Sharjah? Flat decks of MCG every fricking Boxing Day?
Rubbish. If the bowlers were averaging around 40 then your arguement would be valid, but they aren't.
Crap. Australia had atleast 6-7 bowlers averaging from low 20s to mid 20s alone. India had absolutely NONE. Makes a huge difference.
Oh, and who mentored Taylor? So Border is now response accorinding to all of this? No. Taylor's part in Australia's dominance over Steve Waugh was very little.
No, Taylor mentored Waugh, murtured McGrath, Ponting and Warne, not to mention Steve Waugh himself. Waugh did not "create" or "nurture" any World Class talent except perhaps Brett Lee.
Tasmania isn't even connected to the rest of Australia, it's basically a smaller verison of New Zealand. Hobart is equally as worse as England. Hobart is one of the closest thing to Antartica - Wake up, son.
:laugh So Antarctica has a role in determining pitches of Australia? LMAO.
Even in that case, Sehwag does better than Hayden in Australia.
Yeah, he made one good hundred in Australia and cashed in on the flattest Australian wicket of the past 7 years. When Sehwag last toured Australia, he wasn't even good enough to be in the starting XI for the start of the series. It speaks volumes about Virender Sehwag's record in Australia as he probably would've failed.
Yes, MCG is flattest Aussie wicket, where Hayden made most 100s.
LOL, Sehwag has made 3 hundreds in Indian victories out of 25 wins and has made 9 hundreds out of 27 draws. If the 1000 run arguement doesn't mean anything in regards to batsmanship then this surely does. Hayden on the otherhand scored 23 hundreds out of 71 victories and 5 hundreds in 14 drawn matches. Hayden scores hundreds in every 3rd match Australia wins whilst Sehwag scores a hundred every 8th match that India win.
No. of 100s in wins, losses and draws do not count. By that pathetic logic, next thing you'd be saying is that Hayden > Lara because Lara has so many 100s in vain?
Hayden actually made runs, unlike Sehwag who hasn't been able to register more then a half-century in South Africa & New Zealand as an opener. :laugh
No, Sehwag will definitely improve as only getting to his peak, like Hayden did.
Since 2002, in the duration of Sehwag's career, Hayden has comprehensively outperformed Sehwag in those conditions.
Does not mean anything. Sehwag was still maturing, whereas Hayden was at his peak during the same period. WE'll see from now on, as their respective ages are more comparable.
Not as bad as Sehwag in South Africa 2006. He was a sitting duck against lesser bowlers and averaged under 10.
Atleast Sehwag was learning during the period, unlike Hayden who was a sitting duck till he turned 30, :laugh
Opening batsman face pace bowlers, not mediums or spinners. Most batsman in world cricket move their feet to pace bowlers but Sehwag doesn't. Watch him bat.
Crap. Sehwag averages 50, an 58 in Australia. And considering Australia does not have a spinner to show for life, it does mean something.