Best Wicket Keeper-Batsman in Test Cricket

Who's the Best Keeper-Batsman currently playing Test Cricket


  • Total voters
    118

King Pietersen

ICC Board Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Location
Manchester
Was thinking about this earlier, and realised that in Test cricket the difference between the top keepers is incredibly slim. Most Test sides have a decent keeper, and most of them can bat abit as well. It's a key position in the team, and as the game as moved on (since the introduction of Adam Gilchrist into Test cricket) the ability to bat has also become key. So the purpose of this thread will be to detirmine the best all-round keeper batsman. To keep things fair, the fact Dhoni is captain is of no significance, as we're focusing purely on the keeping and batting ability. Here are the main contenders:

Brad Haddin

Haddin's introduction to Test cricket came with alot of hype, he's been earmarked to be Gilly's successor for a few years, and has now been given that chance. His Test career didn't start brilliantly, but as he's developed into the role his game as improved immensely. Haddin struggled in India and the West Indies, but very solid home series against New Zealand (averaging 65 with 1 hundred) and South Africa (averaging 45) has brought his overall career average up to a solid 38.

Haddin's keeping ability is also impressive, looking very solid keeping against all the Australian bowlers, even the searing pace and lack of accuracy from Shaun Tait. Haddin did struggle somewhat in India with his keeping, but I think that was more due to him struggling in the conditions having not had alot of cricket there before. He's certainly got alot of ability though.

Mahendra Singh Dhoni

The poster boy of Indian cricket. He's widely regarded as one of the best all-round players currently in the game, although that reputation does primarily spout from his OD cricket. Dhoni's keeping ability has very few flaws, but it's his batting in Tests that leaves alot to be desired. His record's far from awful, averaging 36, but it's the lack of hundreds that could be a worry. Dhoni's only passed 50 in 15 of his 56 Test innings, converting only 1 of those into a hundred.

He's certainly got alot of talent, but hasn't quite converted that into Test cricket. He also had a very average 2008 as well, averaging 35 with the bat, and failing to make a score of real substance. His only hundred came in his 2nd year of Test, leaving him 2 years without a Test hundred, and that's something he'll have to put right. He is a fantastic wicket-keeper though, you can't take that away from him.

Matthew Prior

Matty Prior has always been under the spotlight, not for his batting, but for his wicket-keeping. He's been nothing short of fantastic with the bat in Test cricket, an average of over 40 from 12 games, 6 of those away from home, and 5 of them in the subcontinent, a place that Brad Haddin struggled. The only problem with Prior is his past record in Test cricket with the gloves. In Sri Lanka he had a terrible time, failing to pick up the ball from Ryan Sidebottom's bowling on a number of ocassions. Since his return to the side he's looked far more solid though, and I cannot recall a real chance spilled since he came back in.

I think in terms of batting Prior's the best in the world, but his keeping does let him down somewhat.

Mark Boucher

Mark Boucher's the most experienced of all the keepers currently playing, having played 123 Test matches. Boucher's reputation is that he's a fighter, and a battler. He often relishes coming into bat when South Africa are in trouble, and very rarely lets the side down. His batting average of 30 with 5 Hundreds is nothing special, but it's a decent enough record for a guy that started his career in a far more bowler dominated era, having to face guys like Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Glenn McGrath, Curtley Ambrose and Courtney Walsh.

Boucher's keeping has also been incredibly useful, and he has been consistently fantastic with the gloves throughout his career. He holds the record for catches in Test match cricket and has been in the South African side for a very long time.

Brendon McCullum

Arguably one of the most improved players in International Cricket. McCullum has developed into one of New Zealands best batsmen, and although his record doesn't show it, he is a fantastically talented batsman. McCullum is also a natural entertainer, he's one of the most exciting batsmen to watch in World Cricket, constantly trying to take the attack to the opposition bowlers.

The excitement also is shown in his keeping, with him being one of the most agile and athletic keepers in the game. McCullum has pulled off some of the best catches from a keeper in the past few years, one that instantly springs to mind is one in an ODi last year in New Zealand to dismiss Ian Bell, showed fantastic reactions and tremendous hands. He's a fantastic keeper, and very rarely drops a chance. It's just the consistency with the bat that has flattered to decieve in his career thus far.

Prasanna Jayawardene

The final selection on this little shortlist is the Sri Lankan specialist keeper, Prasanna Jayawardene. Widely regarded as one of the best out and out keepers in the world, Jayawardene is fantastically talented with the gloves on. He's performed admirably since coming back into the Sri Lankan side, but the one thing that could stop him from going down as one of the best currently playing is his batting.

In the 23 Tests Jayawardene's played, he's scored 653 runs at an average of 25 with just the 1 hundred and 2 fifties, not exactly a record to shout home about. If we were judging on purely keeping, he'd probably win, but as this is an overall comparison, I don't believe he can be considered the best.

So, make your decision, who do you rate as the best currently playing? Remember this is an all-round comparison, taking not only keeping ability, but their batting record into consideration. It's incredibly close, with alot of players having similar records, and although if I was picking a team to watch I'd go with McCullum, I believe the best all-round candidate is the Aussie, Brad Haddin.

Discuss......
 
Last edited:

tassietiger

International Cricketer
Joined
Mar 15, 2005
Online Cricket Games Owned
Prasanna keeping these days is robbing us of the obvious selection, Kumar Sangakkara. Kumar is pretty good with the gloves, and easily the best batsmen out of all of the keepers - often underrated in that people say Gilly was better. I reckon overall, Sangakkara has Gilly covered.

But of that lot, I reckon Haddin is the best. He's not the best keeper, but we haven't seen the best of his batting, having watched a fair few of his state games, I know he'll cause a headache or two for opposition sides to come.
 

Chimp132

International Cricketer
Joined
Aug 1, 2005
Online Cricket Games Owned
Errrr id say kumar sangakkara, not sure if he still does wicket keeping though ? he does it sometimes ? and i think he averaged 100 in tests last year ?
 

King Pietersen

ICC Board Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Location
Manchester
Prasanna keeping these days is robbing us of the obvious selection, Kumar Sangakkara. Kumar is pretty good with the gloves, and easily the best batsmen out of all of the keepers - often underrated in that people say Gilly was better. I reckon overall, Sangakkara has Gilly covered.

Yes, I agree with you, Sangakkara would be the obvious choice, but he's not keeping wicket anymore, and since he's given up the gloves his batting has improved further.
 

Skater

ICC Chairman
Joined
Jan 12, 2004
Profile Flag
England
Mark Boucher for me. More than a good batsman, a great wicketkeeper and also a leader. He is marginally better than Chris Read.
 

King Pietersen

ICC Board Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Location
Manchester
Mark Boucher for me. More than a good batsman, a great wicketkeeper and also a leader. He is marginally better than Chris Read.

LOL. Boucher's far better than Chris Read ever was. Read's the most over-rated keeper in the world. He's not even the best keeper in England anymore, and being a supposed Essex fan you should know that, James Foster's been far better. Foster's batting is better as well, don't rate Read in the slightest.

Interesting to see that Dhoni's got 2 votes already, care to explain your choice guys? I can't honestly see what he's got over any of the others, other than his captaincy, but as we're not including that in the discussion it's irrelevant.
 

ZoraxDoom

Respected Legend
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Location
Hong Kong
Online Cricket Games Owned
MSD. He may not have performed brilliantly to date, but his record is the second best if you'll disclude Prior due to Prior's poor keeping, but even if you do include Prior, MSD comes third. And he's a solid keeper and probably the second most destructive batsman on the list. So, therefore, he has the 3rd best record, is the 2nd most destructive, and possibly the the 3rd best keeper on that list (Behind Jaya and Haddin, equal to McCullum and Boucher). Boucher's lack of experience when keeping to spin and Dhoni's proficiency at that drags Boucher down a bit and props up MSD.

And then there is the fact that MSD is very experienced, second on the list right? Behind Boucher? And he's got amazing fitness, plays tons of games in a year and does a lot of keeping in the Indian heat and on flat pitches, which often means he is out their keeping for a long time...yea, factor all that together, and he's got to be the best ATM.

Normally, I'd go for Boucher, but he just hasn't been that good batting wise in recent times. There was a phase like 3-4 years back where he could make it to the side as a batsman alone, but I think that time is over, and it'll be short while till De Villiers takes over.

Oh, and I haven't even counted the fact that Dhoni has to do it all while having the pressure of captaincy to go with keeping and batting. Only three others who have managed that well enough are Andy Flower, Gilly (Occasionally) and Alec Stewart, each of whom are a legend in their countries, the first 2 possibly legends of the game in general. And there was Tatenda Taibu, who was robbed of a lot of chances, but was still excellent.

So yea, good keeper, dangerous batsman, decent record, has experience...MSD.
 

Skater

ICC Chairman
Joined
Jan 12, 2004
Profile Flag
England
I am indeed an Essex fan, and I don't feel Foster is right for the England team just yet. I wouldn't want different wicketkeepers for different formats, and if Foster came in I feel that would have to be the case. He isn't quite ready to keep in a Test yet. ODIs, yes. I would give him this season, take him to South Africa, play him and see how he goes.
 

King Pietersen

ICC Board Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Location
Manchester
You don't think Foster's ready in Tests, yet he's played over 100 FC games, and averages 35 with the bat, 2 runs higher than Chris Read, and he's also scored the same amount of hundreds in 66 less games. Foster's got the upper hand on Read in every aspect of his game. His batting is better, his keeper is better and he actually chirps from behind the stumps. Foster > Prior > Davies > Ambrose > Read.
 

ZoraxDoom

Respected Legend
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Location
Hong Kong
Online Cricket Games Owned
McCullum in ODIs even though MSD is ranked the number 1 ODI batsman in the world?
 

Precambrian

International Cricketer
Joined
Dec 31, 2008
Location
India
Online Cricket Games Owned
Regardless of the intent to downgrade Dhoni's performance as a batsman in test matches (centuries at No.7 is not the exact criteria, particularly when you have a solid 6 batsmen above him), I must admit that is one of the best first posts in a thread I've seen here. Well done, Dan.

As to the question, Dhoni. Boucher comes a close second.
 

King Pietersen

ICC Board Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Location
Manchester
Regardless of the intent to downgrade Dhoni's performance as a batsman in test matches (centuries at No.7 is not the exact criteria, particularly when you have a solid 6 batsmen above him), I must admit that is one of the best first posts in a thread I've seen here. Well done, Dan.

As to the question, Dhoni. Boucher comes a close second.

Thankyou =D

Hmm, I'm still not 100% convinced by Dhoni in Test cricket, especially away from India. His overall record away is an average of 33, but that's heavily boosted by a good series against Bangladesh and also a good tour of England. He's got a relatively poor record in South Africa and West Indies, and a shocking record in Australia. His last season of away Tests (2007/2008) was poor also, averaging only 17 and failing to register a score of 50+ in 4 Tests in Australia.

He's got alot of ability, he's proven that in ODi cricket, but I'm still not utterly convinced by his record in Test cricket, and don't agree that he shouldn't be expected to score hundreds because of the guys batting ahead of him. Gilchrist batted in one of the strongest line-ups of all-time, and still managed 17 Hundreds in 96 games, so I don't see India having a strong number 6 as a genuine excuse for Dhoni's lack of hundreds.
 

mattfb

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Location
Australia, Sydney
Online Cricket Games Owned
I think I will go with Boucher. A legendary keeper and a very reliable batsmen as he showed in the SA vs Aus series. His average of 30 is very handy, it might not be a big average but when your coming in behind Smith, McKenzie, Amla, Kallis, Devilliers, Duminy and Prince etc etc a lower order score of 30 could be handy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top