Well if its that difficult and it may be, I don't deny it, then why not use the technological innovations and make their job a little easier. They are humans and they make mistakes but mistakes can be corrected, and there is nothing wrong in correcting mistakes. You are only making the game little bit error free.nikhil_99 said:i agree with you rahul...but one thing we should not forget....that after all they are humans...and they dont get any reply or any sort of technology...to review your decision
They have to first look down at bolwers foot mark for no ball
And then have to follow the ball
When a bolwer is bolwing at 150kph its realy difficult...
ZoraxDoom said:The only thing they need to implement is Umpires having headphones connected to the stump microphone.
Its a good idea but have you ever thought how irritating it will be for the umpire to hear constant chattering by the wicketkeepers when they stand upto the stumps while facing the slow bowlers?Sureshot said:The best post of the thread and the most sensible. :hpraise
One of the most simple things, that can improve Cricket.
Yeah that's there but what about umpires who have grudges against a particular neutral team (Hair->Pakistan) (Bucknor->India)??sohummisra said:As long as we have neutral umpires, its fine!
rahulk666 said:Its a good idea but have you ever thought how irritating it will be for the umpire to hear constant chattering by the wicketkeepers when they stand upto the stumps while facing the slow bowlers?
ofcourse, it can be turned off when necessary but still can be distracting.
hearing the chattering on the field without headphones is different than listening to it constantly with headphones ONSureshot said:They'd most likely hear that chattering anyway, plus the wickie doesn't do it during the delivery, or shouldn't do
At least they still won't understand what the hell all the chattering is about.rahulk666 said:Yeah that's there but what about umpires who have grudges against a particular neutral team (Hair->Pakistan) (Bucknor->India)??