The PlanetCricket View: Championsiness

Joined
Jan 13, 2010
Article by AngryAngy -

Goddamn Bradman


Once upon a time there was a portly blond 23 year old from St Kilda. He averaged about 52 for Victoria and was picked to play the Test against India. The rest, as they say is history. Well, of course, ignoring that he got caned by India. And later by Sri Lanka.

It’s not really a pretty picture when you frame it this way, is it? The success is glossed over, because it’s yet to come. However, that’s the position Australians face whenever someone particularly new is called up. We don’t even do the courtesy of watching a guy play before prejudging him. It’s worth asking whether a Warne could even flourish if selection bayed to such scrutiny.

Still, stories have to start somewhere. Generally speaking, the happy ending isn’t at the start.



You’d think there’d be a few less blowhards in the ‘bring back Warnie’ camp now after his BBL season, but there are still enough. And they’re vocal, because Australia doesn’t have a lot of spinners. It’s even got injured spinners at the moment. It’s very easy to get behind Warne, even if it is pointless. The methods for picking spinners over recent times haven’t been the most orthodox, though to be fair, there are not many spinners left in Australia who haven’t had a gig at some point. That said, if we consider Lyon to be a successful selection, then the best policy might be to take lots of risks until you find one you can tolerate for more than a couple of series. Indeed, that one shining example from history was one of the more speculative picks. And it certainly wasn’t because Tim May was inconceivably horrible.

I doubt so many were right there with Warne when he swept into the Test team. Everyone knows how good Warne became after playing Tests for a year or two, but few care that he came in as a nobody. Even the English were like “who?” in 1993, by which time he’d had a couple of good games. Many want to tell you how good the champions of yesterday were, few can tell you the methods of finding or training such players, or what it was like to see them develop.

All I’m saying is, if a young fella lands an exceedingly good position because a few keen eyes think he looks the part, then it really doesn’t hurt to have an optimistic eye. Players of all ages can surprise. And what’s a good story without a few twists?



More...
 

puddleduck

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Location
Uk
Online Cricket Games Owned
Nice short article. Well written and well said.

Certainly a team that is replacing legends are more prone to judging the new players by the previous yardstick.

In England, we were just happy someone like Strauss or KP batted without fear, or that Monty could land the ball on the square.
 

sifter132

Panel of Selectors
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Location
NSW
Enter Mr Ashton Agar!

I would have zero problems with him being selected in a Test for Australia. When your country has a weakness ie. finding a good spinner, sometimes it takes a few dice rolls to find an answer. And I support giving young kids a go at the top level. Making a talented guy 'prove himself' at Shield level first is just a cop out. If he is only moderately interesting, then yes eg. Ed Cowan. But if you have a guy that has a bit of an X-factor about him, then I think you're better off throwing him in the deep end and seeing how he goes. He can always come back later a better player for the experience eg. Phil Hughes.

Shane Warne was the answer, but only after the selectors had gone through stacks of dude to try and replace Ashley Mallett and Bruce Yardley. They had a go at plenty of guys: a couple of old leggies in 38 year old Bob Holland and 34 year old Trevor Hohns; young Greg Mathews and Peter Sleep as potential spinning all-rounders; a couple of honest left arm Shield level trundlers in Ray Bright, Murray Bennett and Tom Hogan; Peter 'who?' Taylor, and finally Tim May who all got debuts before Warne was found.
 

angryangy

ICC Chairman
Joined
Oct 1, 2004
Nice short article. Well written and well said.

Certainly a team that is replacing legends are more prone to judging the new players by the previous yardstick.

In England, we were just happy someone like Strauss or KP batted without fear, or that Monty could land the ball on the square.
Incidentally I only saw your Eng v Aus writeup on the front page. I couldn't find anywhere to say it was good. So I guess I won't. :p
 

puddleduck

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Location
Uk
Online Cricket Games Owned
Heh, cheers... I guess :p

I've really enjoyed the Women's World Cup, although hopefully back in work from next week so won't be able to stay up till daft'o'clock watching the less mainstream cricket :(
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top