smssia0112
Chairman of Selectors
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2005
John Howard ICC
And Peter Roebuck's opinion: Howard is the wrong choice for the ICC
Basically from 2012, an Australasian will be the ICC president, so Australia and New Zealand are preparing their candidate at the moment. Reports at the moment are that Australia want to nominate former Prime Minister John Howard, well known as a massive cricket fan.
Peter Roebuck reckons it's a bad decision, but I disagree. I think Howard would be fantastic for the job - he's a smart politician with a great track record managing the Australian economy, so the business side of things would be no issue. I think he'd have enough cricket knowledge to be a president, and it'd help to sway the power in cricket back to more of a middle ground between the subcontinent and the rest of the world - he wouldn't be afraid to stand up to the BCCI, and he's not afraid to speak his mind either (the Murali chucking call case in point, misguided though it may have been).
What are everyone's thoughts?
And Peter Roebuck's opinion: Howard is the wrong choice for the ICC
Basically from 2012, an Australasian will be the ICC president, so Australia and New Zealand are preparing their candidate at the moment. Reports at the moment are that Australia want to nominate former Prime Minister John Howard, well known as a massive cricket fan.
Peter Roebuck reckons it's a bad decision, but I disagree. I think Howard would be fantastic for the job - he's a smart politician with a great track record managing the Australian economy, so the business side of things would be no issue. I think he'd have enough cricket knowledge to be a president, and it'd help to sway the power in cricket back to more of a middle ground between the subcontinent and the rest of the world - he wouldn't be afraid to stand up to the BCCI, and he's not afraid to speak his mind either (the Murali chucking call case in point, misguided though it may have been).
What are everyone's thoughts?