manee said:It does clear up alot...I infer that from that only wrist off spinners can bowl a top spinner
blackleopard92 said:actually, all can.
Its just that wrist off/leg spinner would be more dangerous.and produce better top spinners.
manee said:Everyone CAN, but doesnt mean they do...for example...its possible for a part timer (or no timer) to only have the standard delivery at their disposal and some may rather stick to the doosra or flipper or whatever they prefer.
blackleopard92 said:well, they variation is more difficult to achieve than it looks.Take tendulkar, or part time spinners, they can, generally ball two stock deliveries.they are the standard one and "throw it in " type.
It difficult to achieve good variation, otherwise u will be giving free runs.
ziad123_2005 said:Ive seen many part timers bowl top-spinners, and one of the biggest support to that is Younis Khan from Pakistan, he is rarely a bowler, but when bowls has bowled the top-spinner many times.
But players like these ( younis, yuvraj, sehwag ) cannot be classified as part time or permanent bowlers, i would reckon they are add-on bowlers, who dont bowl longer than 2-3 overs, and come in when there is a special situation.
To Finalise, i say every bowler who is not the " add-on " bowler can bowl a top spinner.
manee said:Complex issue indeed
blackleopard92 said:actually, There is a very simple soln.
why not simply limit bowling option of part timers.Lete's say that yuvraj can only bowl leg spin and the fast bowl.
and as new patches come out, in which we can allow a new ability to be given, if the player has mastered it in the real game.
how does that sound?