Tendulkar v Inzamam TEST CRICKET ONLY

[khalek]

Yes I have said it before and i will say it again, Inzy is the best, he is a match winner, those stats prove it very well

Sky is the limit and Inzy is the sky!

 

[shan111]

Yes I have said it before and i will say it again, Inzy is the best, he is a match winner, those stats prove it very well

Sky is the limit and Inzy is the sky!

You two are real greats... you proved not only us, but all people wrong...
:laugh:rtfl:rtfl

 

[h123786]

Yes I have said it before and i will say it again, Inzy is the best, he is a match winner, those stats prove it very well

Sky is the limit and Inzy is the sky!

Look dude ive seen enough of you already sorry but tbh i think tendy is better,u just dont have logic whats the definition of a batsman?A cricketer with specialized skills in batting and BOTH TENDY AND INZI ARE BATSMEN and if u look at the stats u will see that tendulkar owes inzamam in that unless now u and some people cant digest the fact and bring up MOM"s in winning situation and to chose wheter we rather see our team or tendy scores it isnt tendulkars fault when he scores india loses as someone mentioned already if that was the case australians would be legends.And stop comparing inzy to bradman he is nowhere near bradman and was never and even tendulkar.Bradman is better.

And regarding the choking thing didnt Bradman get out for a duck in his final innings?he would have averaged 100.........Now didnt he choke there then?

 

[khalek]

Look dude ive seen enough of you already sorry but tbh i think tendy is better,u just dont have logic whats the definition of a batsman?A cricketer with specialized skills in batting and BOTH TENDY AND INZI ARE BATSMEN and if u look at the stats u will see that tendulkar owes inzamam in that unless now u and some people cant digest the fact and bring up MOM"s in winning situation and to chose wheter we rather see our team or tendy scores it isnt tendulkars fault when he scores india loses as someone mentioned already if that was the case australians would be legends.And stop comparing inzy to bradman he is nowhere near bradman and was never and even tendulkar.Bradman is better.

And regarding the choking thing didnt Bradman get out for a duck in his final innings?he would have averaged 100.........Now didnt he choke there then?

Why are you bringing Bradman into it? why are you bringing Australians into it?? I am only talking about Inzy and Tendy here and i dont want to bring any other batsmen or players and I didn't either. Does the thread title or topic say that who is better? Inzi, Tendy, Bradman, Lara or Australians???

Thats what happens when all important stats say that one player is better and the other players' supporters start to bring other batsman into it

 

[aditya123]

Why are you bringing Bradman into it? why are you bringing Australians into it?? I am only talking about Inzy and Tendy here and i dont want to bring any other batsmen or players and I didn't either. Does the thread title or topic say that who is better? Inzi, Tendy, Bradman, Lara or Australians???

Thats what happens when all important stats say that one player is better and the other players' supporters start to bring other batsman into it

And it is those same IMPORTANT STATS (hahaha) which seem to suggest that Inzy is second only to Bradman !
Would you now not take it with a pinch of salt !
And those same important stats seem to suggest that Clarke>Gavaskar and Waugh !Hahahahaha!
Really important stats those and they seem to tell a lot about the players!Clarke is surely better than Gavaskar,is`nt he! At least the stats seem to suggest so!

 

[khalek]

And it is those same IMPORTANT STATS (hahaha) which seem to suggest that Inzy is second only to Bradman !
Would you now not take it with a pinch of salt !

Yes those are the same important stats which proved Tendulkar has been choking in test cricket since 1998!

 

[h123786]

Why are you bringing Bradman into it? why are you bringing Australians into it?? I am only talking about Inzy and Tendy here and i dont want to bring any other batsmen or players and I didn't either. Does the thread title or topic say that who is better? Inzi, Tendy, Bradman, Lara or Australians???

Thats what happens when all important stats say that one player is better and the other players' supporters start to bring other batsman into it

I am not bringing bradman into it zmario said he's second only to bradman even during the bradman era didnt Australia lose matches?does that mean he sucks?ur saying the saying the same damn thing with tendulkar.

Secondly,i brought the australians into it cause people like u cant digest some of out facts and then bring up MOM's in winning matches,winning % when centuries scored

 

[Karachi Xpress]

Here, here. When I see Sachin, I feel elegance. When I see Inzamam, all I see is one of those fat people you see in village cricket who just use brute force to get his runs.

Guess what...If Inzamam looks like a fat guy you would see in village cricket, I would love to have him in my team when I need to win a test! If fat village cricketers can win games, thats awesome!

 

[khalek]

I am not bringing bradman into it zmario said he's second only to bradman even during the bradman era didnt Australia lose matches?does that mean he sucks?ur saying the saying the same damn thing with tendulkar.

Secondly,i brought the australians into it cause people like u cant digest some of out facts and then bring up MOM's in winning matches,winning % when centuries scored

MOM stats were compared long time ago and yes we realized it doesn't prove anything. Yes i am saying the same damn things again and again because as I said earlier they are important stats and they prove that Inzy is more useful than Tendy in the team because he wins the match for the team and he doesn't get out when the team is in deep trouble trailing by/following on or targeting.

 

[h123786]

MOM stats were compared long time ago and yes we realized it doesn't prove anything. Yes i am saying the same damn things again and again because as I said earlier they are important stats and they prove that Inzy is more useful than Tendy in the team because he wins the match for the team and he doesn't get out when the team is in deep trouble trailing by/following on or targeting.

So u are basically proving that he is only useful while batting in the fourth innings?.Look dude u boost about inzy scoring in the 4th innings ok we say bravo.U say sachin doesnt bat in uselful situations for the sake of argument k accepted.But tell me if say no one performs in the 1st innnings and tendulkar scores a century isnt that a useful innings?A good innnings isnt one neccasarily scored in the 4th innings,u need to understand that

 

[khalek]

So u are basically proving that he is only useful while batting in the fourth innings?.Look dude u boost about inzy scoring in the 4th innings ok we say bravo.U say sachin doesnt bat in uselful situations for the sake of argument k accepted.But tell me if say no one performs in the 1st innnings and tendulkar scores a century isnt that a useful innings?A good innnings isnt one neccasarily scored in the 4th innings,u need to understand that

Yes of course 1st Innings centuries/good knocks are always useful to put the team in a strong position but 2nd innings is where the match will be decided, so even a 40+ score is very useful there and that is where Inzy is better than Tendy, he is a match winner!

 

[h123786]

Yes of course 1st Innings centuries/good knocks are always useful to put the team in a strong position but 2nd innings is where the match will be decided, so even a 40+ score is very useful there and that is where Inzy is better than Tendy, he is a match winner!

So he maybe but we are comparing two BATSMEN,thats what u fail to realize tendulkar flaws in this but as i said u again brought up that match-winning thing.We are comparing BATTING ABILITIES,ELEGANCE,CLASS im ready to accept tendy may flaw in the 4th innings but never am i backing down that tendy is way better than inzy

 

[lightbulb]

Guess what? Monty Panesar has the PERFECT technique, yet he just can't get bat onto ball.

Is he better than say, Michael Vaughan? I don't think so.

You guys are CLUTCHING AT STRAWS now, and you know it.

The fact that Monty having perfect tehnique doesn't mean he's elegant as he never makes contact. Sachin has perfect technique but he scores runs so who would I rather see-Monty or Sachin? Easy, Sachin.

 

[manee]

Guess what? Monty Panesar has the PERFECT technique, yet he just can't get bat onto ball.

Although I have quietly stepped out of this debate, try not to exaggerate. Monty does not have the perfect technique, it is adequate for a specialist batsman, perhaps, but not perfect.

 

[mattfb]

I am not bringing bradman into it zmario said he's second only to bradman even during the bradman era didnt Australia lose matches?does that mean he sucks?ur saying the saying the same damn thing with tendulkar.

Dude he wasn't comparing! He was just saying he is the second best and then he just said second to bradman to show that second is pretty much first when your only behind bradman.