GrayNicolls said:The story review team could give links to matches and certain, stand-out, updates. The people can also read through every other update that isn't mentioned, if they so wish.
Matt, do you really think that people would be stupid enough to put someone's story isn't very good? I'm sure the AI review team don't do that. The review team would suggest ways to the person in which they could imporve their story. No story on here is rubbish.
plympilgrim said:yeah but we will note the main events of the story
plympilgrim said:yeah but as i keep saying you don't have to read our views, its a matter of our opinions
The Spin said:Well just read the damn thing then!
The Spin said:So you are saying people are just going to read one or two updates of a long story? Won't that harm the story writers? It means that every single update would have to be absolutely brilliant for it to be read.
With the nature of reviews it will be fairly obvious to readers which story/ies the reviews prefer. There is no way to get them all exactly even reviews.
Fair enough. If it works out well I might consider it on a permanent basis.Simbazz said:M_Vaughan, we are talking about reviewing the stories. Like having a article wrote up with some ideas from the people i listed, im going to give it a trial runfor the next winner of SOTM.
Do you now understand?
evertonfan said:But in all honesty, most people just look at the pictures when viewing stories so they aren't really interested in reading about it. They'd be more likely to just head right into a story than to read about it first.
m_vaughan said:We have stories running without pictures.