What player do you want in your team?

Badrinath, Kohli, Tiwary, Nayar, Raina, Karthik, Uthappa, Dhawan, Murali Vijay, Yusuf Pathan, Chetashwar Pujara, the list goes on and on and on and on.
 
Badrinath, Kohli, Tiwary, Nayar, Raina, Karthik, Uthappa, Dhawan, Murali Vijay, Yusuf Pathan, Chetashwar Pujara, the list goes on and on and on and on.
Are you serious? I stopped reading after Karthik. What a failure, reverse sweeping Murali and trying to hit him for 6 in 2 consecutive balls.

Now let me ask you this - you are yet to point out where I am "biased" in that comparison above. Do you wish to take that comment back, or wish to show where I was?

Secondly, are any of those players better than Dravid, Tendulkar, Ganguly, or Laxman which I put in India's line up (as their best batting lineup for tests)

Oh, and we have some ideal batsmen to match those as well ;)

Bazid Khan, Ahmed Shehzad, Khurram Manzoor, Azhar Ali, Nasir Jamshed, Khalid Latif, Fawad Alam, Mohammad Hafeez

Anyway, all these comparisons are useless. It's the best test 11, and thats whats compared above.
 
I would love to have Sangakara in my team, hes pure class and he is a lawyer as well. There is nothing not to like about him.
 
Injuries don't judge on whether a player is good or not.
That depends, really.

Let me ask you this - Shane Bond may be an inch or 2 better than Brett Lee (I haven't looked at the stats, so I'm taking a guess, and if I'm wrong, pretend Bond is just a tiny bit better than Lee, but take into account the number of injuries Bond has suffered)

But would you take Brett Lee or Shane Bond (ignoring the ICL saga, and Bond was still an international cricketer)

I think you would have just answered your own question.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top