Badrinath, Kohli, Tiwary, Nayar, Raina, Karthik, Uthappa, Dhawan, Murali Vijay, Yusuf Pathan, Chetashwar Pujara, the list goes on and on and on and on.
Badrinath, Kohli, Tiwary, Nayar, Raina, Karthik, Uthappa, Dhawan, Murali Vijay, Yusuf Pathan, Chetashwar Pujara, the list goes on and on and on and on.
Are you serious? I stopped reading after Karthik. What a failure, reverse sweeping Murali and trying to hit him for 6 in 2 consecutive balls.
Now let me ask you this - you are yet to point out where I am "biased" in that comparison above. Do you wish to take that comment back, or wish to show where I was?
Secondly, are any of those players better than Dravid, Tendulkar, Ganguly, or Laxman which I put in India's line up (as their best batting lineup for tests)
Oh, and we have some ideal batsmen to match those as well
Bazid Khan, Ahmed Shehzad, Khurram Manzoor, Azhar Ali, Nasir Jamshed, Khalid Latif, Fawad Alam, Mohammad Hafeez
Anyway, all these comparisons are useless. It's the best test 11, and thats whats compared above.
Let me ask you this - Shane Bond may be an inch or 2 better than Brett Lee (I haven't looked at the stats, so I'm taking a guess, and if I'm wrong, pretend Bond is just a tiny bit better than Lee, but take into account the number of injuries Bond has suffered)
But would you take Brett Lee or Shane Bond (ignoring the ICL saga, and Bond was still an international cricketer)
I think you would have just answered your own question.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.