What to do with Pietersen?

Owzat

International Coach
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Online Cricket Games Owned
Out 19 times to a left arm spinner in his last 61 Tests is a much quoted stat over the last few days, the media clearly quite excited by it. Now every side (with any sense that is) will include a left arm spinner. But what to do with him? Play through it is what England often do, Test batsmen in the past few years have been virtually undroppable with Strauss and Collingwood two examples of players who carried on through poor form. Or drop him and send him back to county cricket to work on his technique/approach to spinners?

Are England psychologically overdependent on Pietersen?

Pietersen Test innings breakdown

1-31 : 31 inns, 1485 runs @ 49.50
32-62 : 31 inns, 1509 runs @ 52.03
63-93 : 31 inns, 1500 runs @ 50.00
94-124 : 31 inns, 1175 runs @ 40.52

By his own standards he has dropped considerably in form in his last 31 innings, and if it wasn't for his 227 against the aussies that would be 948 runs in his last 30 innings @ 33.86 which is not good by anyone's standards. If you take his last 10 innings he's scored 392 runs @ 39.20 but that includes said 227 and FIVE scores in single figures - he's only been out in single figures 30 times in his Test career including six ducks of which two have come in his last eight innings.
 
What to do with him?. Just continuously back him, he will be killing world attacks fairly soon again. Of that im very confident.
 
England have gone pass the depending on KP period now. I think Cook at the top of the order and Trott and Bell in the middle order, further strengthened with the addition of Morgan, that is one of the best batting line ups in world cricket.

The fact that many teams WILL include left arm spinners just to try and get KP out shows that he's still a threat psychologically to opposition teams. I have no doubt he will come good in his own time and I see it happening in this series. Like Haarithan said, "Form is Temporary, class is permanent."
 
Players are bound to go through a form slump at some stage in their career. Pietersen is a skilled and classy player. Someone of his calibre will bounce back.
 
Indeed and it must be said that the England team has supported Pietersen very well. Apart from the double hundred vs Australia, he hasn't really impressed in the last year or so but the England team knows that someone as talented as Pietersen, just needs to be supported and he will perform The current series vs Sri Lanka is crucial for him. Herath is a very fine left arm spinner, Pietersen needs to play him well and get into form. Get Monty in the nets and say him to bowl to Pietersen, should help him to overcome his weakness. :p
 
Keep him in the team just like India is keeping Dravid from last 3 years.

Well you can't compare Pieterson to Dravid as Pieterson is nothing close to Dravid. There is a reason to keep Dravid in team as he can oftenly score unlike Pieterson who mostly gets single digits. So don't even talk about keeping Pieterson because India is keeping Dravid. This is like saying make Ravi Rampaul the captain of West Indies since Dhoni is the captain of the Indian team. Doesn't make sense!
 
Well you can't compare Pieterson to Dravid as Pieterson is nothing close to Dravid. There is a reason to keep Dravid in team as he can oftenly score unlike Pieterson who mostly gets single digits. So don't even talk about keeping Pieterson because India is keeping Dravid. This is like saying make Ravi Rampaul the captain of West Indies since Dhoni is the captain of the Indian team. Doesn't make sense!

Averages 36 against 4 decent teams since 2008 at a turtle like strike rate.
Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
 
Well you can't compare Pieterson to Dravid as Pieterson is nothing close to Dravid. There is a reason to keep Dravid in team as he can oftenly score unlike Pieterson who mostly gets single digits. So don't even talk about keeping Pieterson because India is keeping Dravid. This is like saying make Ravi Rampaul the captain of West Indies since Dhoni is the captain of the Indian team. Doesn't make sense!

Nah India have been holding on to Dravid when he been totally passed his peak since 2007. Dravid has struggled against all the major teams he has played in the last 4 years. He clearly is no where nearly to undeniable best of between 1998-2007 when he earnt that nickname the "wall".

Dravid's drop in form is similar to Mark Waugh for AUS in the last 2 years of his career & AUS ruthlessly axed him. India have kept on with Dravid from what i've observed because they dont have faith in their many talented young batsmen. Badrinath could have easily been in the test side since early 2010 & Laxman could have been batting @ # 3.


KP has only been out of form since the 2009 tour on England because of injury which he took a while to recover from. The saga of losing the captaincy. His issues with left-arm spinners. His situation is far more stable with ENG, than Dravid is with IND.
 
The situation with the amount in his bank account is whats done him in.

The hunger has gone.

His best is behind him now, england dont need him anymore and he knows it.
 
finally some other people that believe Dravid is being carried by the rest of the Indian team. They are fortunate to have such a strong batting line up or Dravid would stick out like a sore thumb.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top