puddleduck said:I just won with Middlesex against Kent by 255 runs, Ed Smith scored an unbeaten 250 odd. Not going to be carrying on though, it's extremely badly put together in terms of menus and layout, and apart from some nice features like the stats that flash up in game, it is for all intents and purposes dire.
Had to laugh at Geraint Jones chasing every sweep and leg glance to the boundary though lol
AND:puddleduck said:Looks can be deceiving matey
For example this screen looks nice yet manages to encompass enough unreality to really discredit the game I took it because Bangladesh had just thrashed the Aussies. Only noticed when I looked at it afterwards that Sussex had also scored a 1055 with Yardy getting 496!
Seems that their second innings was adding to the deficit, that's a lack of incentive to do well if I've ever seen onejamee999 said:AND:
512 - (271+166) = A lead of 75. Not 407
Indeed. ?20 for a not even half finished game? Cant see anyone buying it, i certainly wont. So much work needs doing on it its untrue.puddleduck said:as I said that one screenie does a great job at highlighting more than enough glaring errors with the game.