Insomniac
Title Recipient
2009 T20 WC:
1. Ajantha Mendis averages 9.08 with 12 wickets taken; economy 4.95
1. Umar Gul averages 10.75 with 12 wickets taken; economy 6.29
2. Saeed Ajmal averages 11.25 with 12 wickets taken; economy 5.62
3. Shahid Afridi averages 12.90 with 10 wickets taken; economy 5.37
2. Lasith Malinga averages 13.91 with 12 wickets taken; economy 7.70
3. Angelo Mathews averages 16.80 with 5 wickets taken; economy 6.00
4. Muttiah Muralitharan averages 17.25 with 8 wickets taken; economy 5.75
5. Isuru Udana averages 24.00 with 5 wickets taken; economy 8.57
4. Abdul Razzaq averages 27.00 with 2 wickets taken, but his economy is 5.68
5. Mohammad Aamer averages 29.00 with 5 wickets taken; economy 7.25.
Pakistani wickets (from main strike bowlers): 41
Sri Lanka wickets (from main strike bowlers): 42
Pakistani average runs conceded per wicket: 18.18
Sri Lankan average runs conceded per wicket: 16.21
Pakistani average runs conceded per over (economy): 6.04
Sri Lankan average runs conceded per over (economy): 6.59
So interesting statistics to look at... As far as wickets taken, thats almost neck and neck, will probably end up equal after the final.
As far as my calculations are concerned, the average runs conceded per wicket are taken by just adding up the averages and dividing by 5. Average economy is self explanatory (add up economy rates, divide by 5)
So it seems Pakistan will be more likely to limit the opposition, while Sri Lanka will take wickets. Both teams have taken different methods as far as bowling is concerned (although they have similar attacks), but both have got them to the final.
Regarding send2yaari's fast / spin comparisons regarding bowling...
Pakistani spinners (Afridi & Ajmal) average 12.08 per wicket, economy is 5.50, and have taken 22 wickets.
Sri Lankan spinners (Murali & Mendis) average 13.17 per wicket, economy is 5.35, and have taken 20 wickets.
Prehaps the Pakistani spinners have gone after wickets while the Sri Lankan spinners have looked to slow down the rate. Take your pick as to which team's are better.
Pakistani pacers (Gul, Aamer, Razzaq) average 22.25 per wicket, economy is 6.41, have taken 19 wickets.
Sri Lankan pacers (Malinga, Mathews, Udana) average 18.24 per wicket, economy is 7.42, have taken 22 wickets.
I guess send2yaari is correct depending on how you look at it - the Pakistani pacers (and spinners - an economy of 5.50 is not bad) have controlled the game, while the Sri Lankans have attacked and gone for wickets with their pacemen. Although prehaps the stats are a little skewed with Mathews 3 wicket opening over that was really gifted to him by the Windies (it was good bowling, but 3 inside edges?)
Make of it what you will
1. Ajantha Mendis averages 9.08 with 12 wickets taken; economy 4.95
1. Umar Gul averages 10.75 with 12 wickets taken; economy 6.29
2. Saeed Ajmal averages 11.25 with 12 wickets taken; economy 5.62
3. Shahid Afridi averages 12.90 with 10 wickets taken; economy 5.37
2. Lasith Malinga averages 13.91 with 12 wickets taken; economy 7.70
3. Angelo Mathews averages 16.80 with 5 wickets taken; economy 6.00
4. Muttiah Muralitharan averages 17.25 with 8 wickets taken; economy 5.75
5. Isuru Udana averages 24.00 with 5 wickets taken; economy 8.57
4. Abdul Razzaq averages 27.00 with 2 wickets taken, but his economy is 5.68
5. Mohammad Aamer averages 29.00 with 5 wickets taken; economy 7.25.
Pakistani wickets (from main strike bowlers): 41
Sri Lanka wickets (from main strike bowlers): 42
Pakistani average runs conceded per wicket: 18.18
Sri Lankan average runs conceded per wicket: 16.21
Pakistani average runs conceded per over (economy): 6.04
Sri Lankan average runs conceded per over (economy): 6.59
So interesting statistics to look at... As far as wickets taken, thats almost neck and neck, will probably end up equal after the final.
As far as my calculations are concerned, the average runs conceded per wicket are taken by just adding up the averages and dividing by 5. Average economy is self explanatory (add up economy rates, divide by 5)
So it seems Pakistan will be more likely to limit the opposition, while Sri Lanka will take wickets. Both teams have taken different methods as far as bowling is concerned (although they have similar attacks), but both have got them to the final.
Regarding send2yaari's fast / spin comparisons regarding bowling...
Pakistani spinners (Afridi & Ajmal) average 12.08 per wicket, economy is 5.50, and have taken 22 wickets.
Sri Lankan spinners (Murali & Mendis) average 13.17 per wicket, economy is 5.35, and have taken 20 wickets.
Prehaps the Pakistani spinners have gone after wickets while the Sri Lankan spinners have looked to slow down the rate. Take your pick as to which team's are better.
Pakistani pacers (Gul, Aamer, Razzaq) average 22.25 per wicket, economy is 6.41, have taken 19 wickets.
Sri Lankan pacers (Malinga, Mathews, Udana) average 18.24 per wicket, economy is 7.42, have taken 22 wickets.
I guess send2yaari is correct depending on how you look at it - the Pakistani pacers (and spinners - an economy of 5.50 is not bad) have controlled the game, while the Sri Lankans have attacked and gone for wickets with their pacemen. Although prehaps the stats are a little skewed with Mathews 3 wicket opening over that was really gifted to him by the Windies (it was good bowling, but 3 inside edges?)
Make of it what you will
