sohum
Executive member
I haven't read the papers yet, this morning, but has this been confirmed as a terrorist attack?
sohummisra said:I haven't read the papers yet, this morning, but has this been confirmed as a terrorist attack?
Really shocking for we people and it was a really sad evening yesterday .Brett_Lee said:I agree there zorax. As stevo said there isnt much here in aus there isnt much on sky news active havnt watched it on normal tv.
As the sky news pplz said that the bomb pattern was similar to madrids what do you guys think?
Mumbai is India`s financial capiltal just like New York or London.Adarsh said:Thing is, the terrorist organisations have always been hating the West, like the USA and the UK. Why would they want to bomb India? Makes no sense.
India is Al Qaeda's target number 2 (after Israel) due to the Kashmir imbroglio. I am just repeating what Al-Zawahiri had said in an interview a few years back. India has been dealing with terrorist attacks for the last 25 years. Although I doubt that Al Qaeda has any direct responisibility for this, but one of their splinter or sister organizations may very well be. But it is not my job to hazard a guess.Adarsh said:Thing is, the terrorist organisations have always been hating the West, like the USA and the UK. Why would they want to bomb India? Makes no sense.
The way I see it, terrorists have decided that instead of attacking State institutions or symbols of the State, let us go for soft targets. That is, innocent civilians on local trains were consciously targetted, unlike in the past when they came in the way of attacks usually aimed at military installations, political leaders and State institutions.zoraxdoom said:I think it was either:
A) Really bad planning - all the bombs probably should have gone off in one minute, not 11!
B) A giant coincidence - 8 terrorists groups decided to set off bombs at rush hour, but happen to choose the very same hour.
C) An attack probably used to cause an impact, not any serious damage per say. Just to attract attention, maybe as a diversion for something else...
To be fair, it's mainly the "gutter press" that are blanking it. The papers that are worth bothering with are giving it the prominence a tragedy of this magnitude deserves.Ritwik said:Quite sad to hear about the British media's virtual blank-out of the event. If this had been New York or Madrid, it would've received far greater attention in Europe, but then again it took 9/11 for the west to wake upto terrorism inspite of what had been happening in India, israel/palestine and even Northern Ireland.
Although, as Northern Ireland has shown, such a tactic doesn't work. In the end, the only way to overcome these problems is to sit down and talk about it like adults. Sadly, it seems like the people doing the arguing have all the intellectual capacity of a five year old. A five year old with guns, no less. Whilst the majoirty of people, who just want to live their lifes without fear of being killed, are caught in the middle.Ritwik said:The way I see it, terrorists have decided that instead of attacking State institutions or symbols of the State, let us go for soft targets. That is, innocent civilians on local trains were consciously targetted, unlike in the past when they came in the way of attacks usually aimed at military installations, political leaders and State institutions.