How is this possible? I played this guy online and he had 5-6 bastmen all of them averaging quite a lot, like 200 and more in FC, tests etc. And instead of specialist bowlers, he had 5 allrounders averaging 60-70 with the bat and 10-12 with the ball. And he was only in year somewhere just over 2050, so not very far ahead in the game. I myself have a very good team and win most of my games online, but just curious as to how someone can have a good team like that. Any ideas?
batsmen averaging 200 +
- Thread starter ICC2006
- Start date
warrior123
Club Cricketer
Is that actually there FC record, or just their Online records?
If they are FC records, well then i'm not sure lol, i guess if you play it long enough you will eventually get all the good players - and even produce good young players who stick with yo, for 10 years and so, and do average 60+ with the bat and 10-15 with the bowl.
But hey, ask him if you see him online next time, see what he sais.
If they are FC records, well then i'm not sure lol, i guess if you play it long enough you will eventually get all the good players - and even produce good young players who stick with yo, for 10 years and so, and do average 60+ with the bat and 10-15 with the bowl.
But hey, ask him if you see him online next time, see what he sais.
warrior123 said:Is that actually there FC record, or just their Online records?
If they are FC records, well then i'm not sure lol, i guess if you play it long enough you will eventually get all the good players - and even produce good young players who stick with yo, for 10 years and so, and do average 60+ with the bat and 10-15 with the bowl.
But hey, ask him if you see him online next time, see what he sais.
I checked their profiles and it was their FC, test average. And they weren't just averaging 60 +, it's 200 and more, i don't remember but probably ave over 100, 150 in odis and one days online also. I think you eventually get players as good as these in year 2100 and onwards maybe, but he's around 2050 only. I'm in year 2053, and I have batsmen who average 60-70 in FC and tests. And his allrounders, usually as the game goes on, you dont get very good allrounders, but he had them ave around 10 with the ball. I think he definitely cheated or did something different to get these players because there's no other way, as for asking him I'm pretty sure he won't tell.
Griffo said:
team name is MEHH, and he's ranked 29 the last time I saw him.
warrior123
Club Cricketer
ICC2006 said:
Well then with that paragraph i think your right. Surely you cant get that good of players both with bowl and bat, just doesn't seem right.
Also yep guess he wouldn't tell us if he cheated.
offdriven4
Club Cricketer
even bradman failed sometimes griffo...
offdriven4
Club Cricketer
more likely to just be the stats
Griffo said:
I know he has 4 losses. He told me it was before when he didn't have a good team but then when he had one, he was ranked number 1. Then he stopped playing for some time and if you don't play regularly your rating goes down, so he's at 29 now, so I'm just assuming he's started playing again now since I played him today.
If I do find him and play him next time around, I'll get some screenshots of his players' stats and post them here.
warrior123
Club Cricketer
Yep me also - see the stats of this guy, because truly, i cant see how you get averages of over 200 with the bat and 10 with the bowl, not possible!
I'm sure he's playing on normal because you can't play on easy and play online. I know there's one method to get great players by checking read only box of your .cap file and waiting till u get a good player, but even with that in year around 2050, you can only get guys to average 70-80 at the most. Funny thing is he has allrounders who average 60 with the bat, 10-11 with the ball which is impossible in this game for allrounders.
Insomniac
Title Recipient
I have a bowler who averages 9 with the ball and 30 with the bat in ODis.
And he just gave his worst performance today, 3/63 in 10 overs
And he just gave his worst performance today, 3/63 in 10 overs
