for those who CRITICISE BLIC2005

[carl johnson]

best game ever made and the best game has no big difference and anyway use common sense cuz some one has to make it for us to buy and play

 

[fanirama]

blic = 2/10

1 point for codemasters trying and giving fact of the day
1 point for a demo that you can bat and bowl

-8 points for crappy ai, cartoony graphics, headache inducing camera angles and cutaways right when you're playing a shot, no advance/backfoot and a host of other annoyances/bugs
In general a poor competitor to EA Cricket 2005 for a game that looks like it belongs in 2000 or 2001.

 

[asheswonder]

mmmm having been able to play both i think BLIC is fairly easy to pickup and play as is CK2005 , but for me at the moment the big difference is the mod ability for cricket 2005 is far superior, BLIC sadly suffers from being very non-user friendly to mod graphics like the previous version , lets hope the good modding community can get to grips with it

 

[icyman]

blic = 2/10

1 point for codemasters trying and giving fact of the day
1 point for a demo that you can bat and bowl

-8 points for crappy ai, cartoony graphics, headache inducing camera angles and cutaways right when you're playing a shot, no advance/backfoot and a host of other annoyances/bugs
In general a poor competitor to EA Cricket 2005 for a game that looks like it belongs in 2000 or 2001.

you are wrong.

the game was originally meant to compete with the likes of ian bothams cricket and allan border and cricket 97 not with cric 2001/2000
:happy

i would also add -2 for no autoplay and advance shot and fake name.also the game runs too fast.

 

[fanirama]

you are wrong.

the game was originally meant to compete with the likes of ian bothams cricket and allan border and cricket 97 not with cric 2001/2000
:happy

i would also add -2 for no autoplay and advance shot and fake name.also the game runs too fast.

Haha.
Agree there mate.