Man of the Match

[woosaah]

Ok, Chris Gale was man of the match for this game which i find weird. Yeah ok he scored a century in each innings and ammased 235 runs for the match which is a good effort. but what about W Thompson who picked up 12 wickets to help win the match?

Or what about Craig McMillan who also scored 2 centurys but ammassed 259 runs with one of the centurys a not out.

not a gripe just really showing that this was a good game, went down to the last session not my closest one, i won a game on the last over of a first class match, now thats exciting!!! :P

 

[langerrox]

yeh thats happened alot to me, maybe he got caught a few or got a wicket?

 

[Hoffy95]

yeah i reckon gayle probably got a couple of wickets. He does bowl quite a bit in real life, so the computer would've bowled him as well.

 

[danelston]

Well he can only of taken 2 and that doesnt deserve the mom

 

[RoboRocks]

The computer doesn't bowl Chris Gayle in ICC 2005

 

[woosaah]

macca or thompson shud have got it i would of thoght

 

[S_Harmison]

Im with woosah!

 

[Liam Williams]

Yeah, both of McMillan's centuries were better.

 

[newzolt]

I too had a similar experience.Look at the match stats below and decide for yourself who'd be a better candidate for the man of the match award?

 

[tassietiger]

Taking BOTH innings into account, Ishaq deserved it.

 

[langerrox]

yeh wtf, of course ishaq did, 2 centuries vs a 180*

 

[newzolt]

OK then the comp's right.

 

[FreddieFan]

I once had a dodgy one - my spinning all-rounder took 16 wickets in the match and the game gave MOTM to one of my batsmen who scored 130-odd in my second innings.

 

[tassietiger]

OK then the comp's right.

haha not sure if it was meant to be funny or not, but the way you admitted that was hilarious.

 

[newzolt]

I just had this match.IMO Brummer is a better candidate for man of the match considering his all round performance and further more he is on the winning side.Warner has scored 23 runs in both innings if his batting performance is considered.