sachin
International Coach
But surely we've come to an understanding.Murali is legal!
Muralis standard action was always legal (bar that time Darryl Hair called him for throwing). Thankyou for coming people.andrew_nixon said:I would like to see JarryD admit that Murali's standard delivery has always been legal.
Some are never satisfied....Sureshot said:What?
A delivery is only considered illegal if it's been proved so by the scientists, NOT because an umpire called him for throwing.
That's wrong actually.......Sureshot said:What?
A delivery is only considered illegal if it's been proved so by the scientists, NOT because an umpire called him for throwing.
Why?andrew_nixon said:I would like to see JarryD admit that Murali's standard delivery has always been legal.
Because he'd previously said it wasn't.sachin said:Why?
andrew_nixon said:That's wrong actually.......
But why does it matter?andrew_nixon said:Because he'd previously said it wasn't.
Close..... if an umpire calls a bowler for throwing then that particualr delivery is illegal. It does not mean that every delivery that bowler bowls is illegal.Sureshot said:Really?
Ok then i'll rephrase it.
How about.
Just because a umpire calls a bowler for throwing doesn't mean it's illegal.
Or am i still wrong?
Exactly the same procedure as for a beamer or for running on the pitch. Two warnings then out of attack on a third offense.Sureshot said:Oh i get you know, I've never seen a game when a bowler is called for throwing, What happens?
No Ball, taken out of the attack?