Murali not so innocent

andrew_nixon said:
I would like to see JarryD admit that Murali's standard delivery has always been legal.
Muralis standard action was always legal (bar that time Darryl Hair called him for throwing). Thankyou for coming people.
 
What?

A delivery is only considered illegal if it's been proved so by the scientists, NOT because an umpire called him for throwing.
 
andrew_nixon said:
That's wrong actually.......

Really?

Ok then i'll rephrase it.

How about.

Just because a umpire calls a bowler for throwing doesn't mean it's illegal.

Or am i still wrong?
 
Sureshot said:
Really?

Ok then i'll rephrase it.

How about.

Just because a umpire calls a bowler for throwing doesn't mean it's illegal.

Or am i still wrong?
Close..... if an umpire calls a bowler for throwing then that particualr delivery is illegal. It does not mean that every delivery that bowler bowls is illegal.
 
Oh i get you know, I've never seen a game when a bowler is called for throwing, What happens?

No Ball, taken out of the attack?
 
Sureshot said:
Oh i get you know, I've never seen a game when a bowler is called for throwing, What happens?

No Ball, taken out of the attack?
Exactly the same procedure as for a beamer or for running on the pitch. Two warnings then out of attack on a third offense.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top