Murali not so innocent

[angryangy]

With JarryD though, Murali is guilty even after being proven innocent.

In fairness, it was decided that his doosra was illegal.

 

[andrew_nixon]

In fairness, it was decided that his doosra was illegal.

Under the old rules.

But when the same people showed that his standard delivery was legal, JarryD wouldn't believe them.

 

[Jarryd]

Under the old rules.

But when the same people showed that his standard delivery was legal, JarryD wouldn't believe them.

It was legal when they changed the rules to suit him yes. Because god forbid we upset the Sub-Continent.

 

[andrew_nixon]

It was legal when they changed the rules to suit him yes. Because god forbid we upset the Sub-Continent.

His standard delivery was legal BEFORE they changed the rules!

 

[Jarryd]

His standard delivery was legal BEFORE they changed the rules!

Bah, no point debating with those less intelligent.

 

[aussie1st]

His standard delivery was legal BEFORE they changed the rules!

Andrew is right. Murali's doosra was the illegal delivery not his normal one.

 

[Jarryd]

Andrew is right. Murali's doosra was the illegal delivery not his normal one.

Thats what I'm saying.

 

[andrew_nixon]

Let me get something straight here (excuse the pun)..... JarryD, do you accept that Murali's stnadard delivery is completely legal, and always has been? If so, then I apologise.

 

[Sureshot]

Bah, no point debating with those less intelligent.

He's probably the most intelligent on the forum.

Murali is also double jointed that makes a BIG difference.

 

[pal]

But when the same people showed that his standard delivery was legal, JarryD wouldn't believe them.

It was legal when they changed the rules to suit him yes. Because god forbid we upset the Sub-Continent.

His standard delivery was legal BEFORE they changed the rules!

Bah, no point debating with those less intelligent.

Andrew is right. Murali's doosra was the illegal delivery not his normal one.

Thats what I'm saying.

No, that's not what you were saying.

 

[icyman]

why does'nt someone change the name of the topic

 

[sachin]

Why doesn't someone close this stupid thread?

 

[icyman]

it was, it wasnot, it was ,it was not


there's no point debating as it is legal now

 

[sachin]

So it should be closed now. :

 

[Sureshot]

There's always a point to debating, it would be like closing the Pakistan or Australia threads as one series has finished and one hasn't started, forums are here to debate these topics.