Murali not so innocent

Jarryd

Club Cricketer
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Location
Wattle Glen, Melbour
Online Cricket Games Owned
andrew_nixon said:
I would like to see JarryD admit that Murali's standard delivery has always been legal.
Muralis standard action was always legal (bar that time Darryl Hair called him for throwing). Thankyou for coming people.
 

Sureshot

Executive member
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Location
England
Online Cricket Games Owned
What?

A delivery is only considered illegal if it's been proved so by the scientists, NOT because an umpire called him for throwing.
 

Sureshot

Executive member
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Location
England
Online Cricket Games Owned
andrew_nixon said:
That's wrong actually.......

Really?

Ok then i'll rephrase it.

How about.

Just because a umpire calls a bowler for throwing doesn't mean it's illegal.

Or am i still wrong?
 

andrew_nixon

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Location
Huddersfield, Englan
Online Cricket Games Owned
Sureshot said:
Really?

Ok then i'll rephrase it.

How about.

Just because a umpire calls a bowler for throwing doesn't mean it's illegal.

Or am i still wrong?
Close..... if an umpire calls a bowler for throwing then that particualr delivery is illegal. It does not mean that every delivery that bowler bowls is illegal.
 

Sureshot

Executive member
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Location
England
Online Cricket Games Owned
Oh i get you know, I've never seen a game when a bowler is called for throwing, What happens?

No Ball, taken out of the attack?
 

andrew_nixon

Chairman of Selectors
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Location
Huddersfield, Englan
Online Cricket Games Owned
Sureshot said:
Oh i get you know, I've never seen a game when a bowler is called for throwing, What happens?

No Ball, taken out of the attack?
Exactly the same procedure as for a beamer or for running on the pitch. Two warnings then out of attack on a third offense.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top