Rate Cricket 2004

[siddharthjha]

Everyone, rate Cricket 2004 out of ten (I haven't got the game yet)

Cheers ;D:

 

[umosay]

6.5 out of 10

 

[DRRRAGONS]

5 out of 10.

batting is fun, graphics i'm afraid do suck (i think people on this board have too low expactations of cricket games) bowling still sucks, can still sweep yorkers, cant get fast bowlers to swing or seam the ball that much yet (i'm this will get better as i do).

however i do like the fact that i got 150 in a 10 over match and was still beaten! yay. AI is actually here.

 

[Nirav85]

9 out of 10

 

[imported_Samuel Vimes]

8/10

 

[anand99]

can still sweep yorkers? come on EA! that just about negates all the other hard work put into this game.

 

[cricketfan1]

5/10? surely not? ive heared such great reviews of this game - or could it juast be the trademark unsatisfied gamer who expects everything !!!

 

[barmyarmy]

Originally posted by cricketfan1@Dec 16 2003, 07:06 PM
- or could it juast be the trademark unsatisfied gamer who expects everything !!!

there's a few of those around here.

 

[cricketfan1]

i think it sounds like a great game and cant see why people have to be so critical!

 

[arpan21989]

I think it is 9.9 out of 10
SUCKER

 

[zuhair125]

7/10

 

[msardi_23]

Takes to long to play a game. Have to wait too long between deliveries. Maybe im just impatient. Graphics and stuff are ok, gameplay has improved. But still have pooh load to go b4 this becomes a great game.

7.5 / 10

 

[msardi_23]

BTW the faces suck. Hayden looks like Andy Flower. Cricket 2002 faces were much better if you ask me.

 

[barmyarmy]

Originally posted by msardi_23@Dec 16 2003, 11:40 PM
BTW the faces suck. Hayden looks like Andy Flower. Cricket 2002 faces were much better if you ask me.

only after we'd edited them...

 

[uman]

10/10