OK, so if you weren't rich, where would you be? If you hadn't bought the best players from around the world, where would you be? Do you think that Cristiano Ronaldo went to play for you because he loved your team spirit? Or because the people there are really nice and they try hard and he likes the culture there? Or do you think it may have had something to do with the millions of pounds he makes? And if your argument is that Chelsea is richest but not the best, then I'll be doing more than laughing at you and your short sightedness.
And I can tell you that it's not a slight cheer when someone scores their 100th point, but yes I'd rather cheer 20 times than once or twice in a game. I'd also hate to go home without scoring a single goal.
So you say that the atmosphere is better (which I still disagree with, and I take the fact that fans feel the need to throw flares at each other or onto the pitch to kill time as an example)
I've got to say that you clearly feel that you're the smartest guy here and that your opinion is fact, so good on you. As I said before, best sport is a personal opinion thing, feel free to argue why soccer is better but all you seem to want to do is laugh at people for what they say because you disagree.
aus5892 added 1 Minutes and 1 Seconds later...
Yes but tactics play a role in every sport. Coaching, defence, attack, tempo, they're all employed in most team sports, certainly in AFL they are.