This leads to another points - how are they so many cricket-ignorant fans on the forum?
I mean, I did claim the RSA ODI attack was one of the best too, but that was just to make the 200 seem Godlike. It isn't really true. Steyn's quality (but not so much in ODIs), and the rest are filler. How can so many people believe the bowling attack is so good? How can so many people not possibly hold a straight argument, veering off the point at hand and bring up completely un-related stats and points and think they're winning the argument? How can people be so dumb? How can they be so thick?
Or, alternatively, how did PC get filled with so many trolls
I mean, I did claim the RSA ODI attack was one of the best too, but that was just to make the 200 seem Godlike. It isn't really true. Steyn's quality (but not so much in ODIs), and the rest are filler. How can so many people believe the bowling attack is so good? How can so many people not possibly hold a straight argument, veering off the point at hand and bring up completely un-related stats and points and think they're winning the argument? How can people be so dumb? How can they be so thick?
Or, alternatively, how did PC get filled with so many trolls
