4GB Bats!

[Lucky]

What do you guys think? I wonder what happened to the side parts of the text?? Anyway. I would like to know your views....
By the way Thanks BF

Lucky

 

[woosaah]

that does look wicked

 

[langerrox]

how does it loook at lower resolutions? i doubt itll look that good at 1280x1024, im pretty sure bf took at 1600x1200 and lowered to the pic res

 

[Deleted member 9102]

Edit: Chris Gayle

 

[Lucky]

I take that you guys liked it I will send lower res ones (1GB AND 2 GB) to BF and then we can compare

 

[Burma's Finest]

how does it loook at lower resolutions? i doubt itll look that good at 1280x1024, im pretty sure bf took at 1600x1200 and lowered to the pic res

Yeah those pics are from 1600*1200 screenshots. I just cropped them so that all the extraneous stuff was removed. I didn't do any scaling though. That's how they look 1:1.

 

[Lucky]

Go Online BF and I'll send you the lower res bats to compare them....

 

[Burma's Finest]

OK, here's the comparison you asked for. All images were cropped from 1600*1200 screenshots with 16xAF and 4xAA.

 

[Lucky]

Thanks BF

 

[Lucky]

What do you guys think?

 

[aussie1st]

2GB looks the same as the 4GB imo.

 

[Lucky]

It does sort of.. I would really liek to see the difference on the smaller details between the 2GB and 4GB Bats....

 

[Burma's Finest]

2GB looks the same as the 4GB imo.

The reason they look similar is fairly simple. The bat textures for 2GB and 4GB are 512*1024 and 1024*2048 respectively. Those screenshots were taken at a resolution of 1600*1200 with the bat itself taking up say 200*650 of screenspace at most. You won't see any difference until the ratio of texture to screen-space occupied is skewed in favour of the screen. Basically, unless you run the game at 2048*1536, you will never see a difference between 2GB and 4GB.

 

[aussie1st]

I see, anyone here that uses 2048 * 1536?

 

[Lucky]

How can you change it?