indiancricketer said:
This is to the First ronaldo7777......BLIC you gave it a 9/10, WHICH is not fair at all the graphic sucked...and You can't edit the game ... the graphics are so wicket in ea cricket 2005.... So what if the feild sucks...Boss is there to replaces...The t.v graphics etc etc....BLic you can't do much with it...The Ai patch can be Replaced for cricket 2005 at anytime....BLIC looks are like circket 2004.... and thats pretty lame it isnt good so i give blic 4.5/10....Cricket 2005 can turn in to a fantastic game...IN BLIC the pitch doesn't WEAR out in Test...in EA it does...THERES Manaul APPEALING in cricket 2005 not in BLIC 2005....THERES AUTO PLAY IN CRICKET 2005 but not IN BLIC....FRONT foot Option is da most important thing....NO RAIn in BLIC in test...Whats with that... doesn't bring it to a realistic match....and The batting in EA is WAY more realistic than BLIC..So before buying think about the graphics...You can EDIT cricket 2005 to make it better...BLIC you can't!
What are you talking about. Graphics are good may be not as good as EA but character model and animation make it looks quite pretty. The game is more colourful and crowd are also good. Overall it very good.
Who said that pitch does not wear. Cricket 2005 is not having manual appealing and I have also heared that created player wont save. Rain are there is both games in test match only.
Batting in EA is more realistic, that is debatable. I prefer BLIC.
Dowload it and see it yourself, about player editing:
http://www.codemasters.co.uk/downloads/?downloadid=18971
Hawk-eye, 5 commentators, I think around 50 stadiums, it's going to be the best cricket game. I am definitely getting BLIC