Cricket telecast should be left to the experts

[viral1991]

Does'nt matter dude,
A Disneyland tournament might even have donald duck and mickey mouse commentating...

Ha Ha, right. We could have penguins for umpires in Antarctica.

 

[Cricket_god]

espn star is the worst they do not even have a speed gun

 

[icyman]

espn star is the worst they do not even have a speed gun

What rubbish !
They have a speed gun.
Infact,they were the channel which launched the Speedster Competition.

 

[Cricket_god]

What rubbish !
They have a speed gun.
Infact,they were the channel which launched the Speedster Competition.

where it is then? in the australia bangladesh series and any series they have in bangladesh they even do not have aspeed gun

 

[icyman]

Look carefully,it props up in the right hand corner of your screen.

 

[rituraj]

Look carefully,it props up in the right hand corner of your screen.

U r kidding right? .

ESPNSTAR dont have in aus-bangla series either speed gun or hawk eye. They have just pathetic bhogle .

 

[aditya123]

U r kidding right? .

ESPNSTAR dont have in aus-bangla series either speed gun or hawk eye. They have just pathetic bhogle .

do you think that any Tv Channel would invest in hawkye for an AUS-BAN series ?

 

[.::Stevo::.]

Depends what TV Channel it is. Like Channel 9 Australia always have all those gizmo stuff no matter who was playing. But for less wealthy channels such as the one showing the AUS-BAN series then probaly not.

 

[Short Leg]

I reckon there not using hawkeye because they dont want it to prove Aleem Dar wrong every time he makes a decision. Let's face it the blokes a tool.

 

[icyman]

But for less wealthy channels such as the one showing the AUS-BAN series then probaly not.

To be quite honest,ESS is a wealthy channel.

 

[m_vaughan]

do you think that any Tv Channel would invest in hawkye for an AUS-BAN series ?

Maybe you dint see the first game, which was one of the best test matches ever.

 

[icyman]

Why is Nimbus still producing pictures for the Abu-Dhabi tournament ?
I suppose the rights were sold to ZEE.
ESPN-STAR was disqualified on technical grounds.
Now what about ZEE ? They made all those claims that they have their own production team.Where is it then ?
This is utter foul play by Subhash Chandra.

 

[Ritwik]

ESPN/STAR have proved that they are the best when it comes to cricket telecast in India. They have the best production values and the best goddamned commentary team by far. But they always seem to bid somewhat lower than the eventual winners. I mean why bid at all when you know that some upstart is going to outbid you by far?

 

[icyman]

Actually ESS has relied to much on technical aspects of the game.
They might have felt that ZEE and Nimbus would be disqualified.
I really don't understand when BCCI disqualified ESS from the bidding process for technical reasons.

 

[harishankar]

I have a feeling that there's a bit of politics also behind the ESPN/Star disqualification. They seem to be out of favour with the BCCI for a few years now... for whatever reason.