ICC study reveals that 99% chuck

djkay

School Cricketer
Joined
Jan 10, 2004
Online Cricket Games Owned
Extensive research conducted by the International Cricket Council has revealed that 99% of bowlers in the history of cricket have been chuckers. The study was undertaken in the wake of the furore surrounding Muttiah Muralitharan, whose doosra was banned earlier this year after Chris Broad, the match referee for the Tests against Australia, reported it to the ICC.

But an article by Derek Pringle in The Daily Telegraph suggests that Murali is no different from the vast majority of his fellow players. The current law states that there should be no straightening or partial straightening of the bowling arm during delivery, and research conducted with precise instrumentation has revealed that even bowlers like Glenn McGrath and Shaun Pollock, considered examplars of the classical action, occasionally go over the prescribed tolerance limit, bending their arms by as much as 12 degrees.

The tolerance levels had been set at five degrees for spinners, seven-and-a-half for medium-pacers, and 10 for quick bowlers, a scenario that had invited much criticism from past greats like Ian Chappell. But the study conducted by three prominent biomechanics experts suggests that the human eye can only detect a kink in the action if the straightening is more than 15 degrees.

As Angus Fraser - one of six former Test cricketers on the committee that reviewed illegal bowling actions in Dubai recently - wrote in The Independent, even the likes of Fred Trueman, Dennis Lillee, Curtly Ambrose, Imran Khan, Richard Hadlee, and Ian Botham were found to have exceeded the straightening-limit set by the ICC.

The biomechanics men - Dr Marc Portus, Professor Bruce Elliott and Dr Paul Hurrion - used cameras shooting at 250 frames per second ? ten times the speed of a TV camera ? to illustrate phenomena like adduction and hyperextension which can convince an observer watching without the aid of technology that the bowler is chucking.

Research was also undertaken during the ICC Champions Trophy in England, where it was found that 13 of the 23 bowlers filmed straightened their arms more than the current permissible levels. Ramnaresh Sarwan, he of the fairly innocuous legspin, was the only man observed who didn't straighten his arm at all.

Based on these findings, the ICC is to extend the tolerance limit to 15 degrees for all bowlers, regardless of whether they bowl at Shane Warne's pace or Shoaib Akhtar's. Match officials will still be expected to note down suspicious actions, and pass on the information to the ICC. But unlike before, remedial action will now be the sole preserve of a new body to the set up to help bowlers with the rehabiliation process.

It will include both former Test bowlers and biomechanics experts, and they will have the authority to fail a bowler. Those exceeding the tolerance limit will be on probation for two years, rather than the current one, but subsequent offences will result in a 12-month ban. It remains to be seen, however, if such a system will be introduced at first-class level.
 

djkay

School Cricketer
Joined
Jan 10, 2004
Online Cricket Games Owned
'About 80% of bowlers have some degree of flexion'

Wisden Cricinfo staff

November 10, 2004

The findings of the three-man panel that did in-depth research on bowling actions for the International Cricket Council will be greeted with immense relief and a sense of vindication by one man. Muttiah Muralitharan has always felt that he was a high-profile, soft target, and the revelation that 99% of bowlers chuck under the current laws will come as no surprise to him.

In an interview with The Sunday Times last August, he had questioned the wisdom of carrying out tests on individuals in isolation. "So many of the people who talk about this issue don't even know what a bowling action is," he had said. "There are cricketers who haven't gone deeper into the subject. They don't know what research has been done in the field. Why check only one or two bowlers? Why not check all? You take Harbhajan Singh, Saqlain [Mushtaq], you take [Ashley] Giles, all the spinners."

The double-standards had also appalled Murali, with the ICC allowing fast bowlers twice as much leeway ? 10 degrees ? despite the fact that Murali's own freakishly supple shoulder generated tremendous ball speed. And when confronted with the accusation that his doosra was illegal, Murali had calmly refocused the spotlight on the bouncer. "If you check the flexion for bouncers, I think it will be more than anything else," he said. "I think every fast bowler straightens his arm when he bowls a bouncer. They're not robots, your arm can only move a certain way. I can challenge anyone. Put every bowler to the test, and see what you get.

"I've been bowling like this for over 10 years, and it's not appropriate to pick out only me. If you check, you'll find that 80% of bowlers have some degree of flexion. They should also be tested to see if their actions are correct."

The figure of 99% will shock and appal those who have followed the game for years, and no doubt elicit angry responses from former legends whose actions were considered beyond reproach. But for Murali, who was once even called a javelin-thrower by Bishan Singh Bedi, the figures back up what he has said all along, that very few actions are without some kink or the other when subjected to high-speed cameras.
 

djkay

School Cricketer
Joined
Jan 10, 2004
Online Cricket Games Owned
Enough said, for everyone that thought that Murali chucked, well I hope this clears everything.
 

djkay

School Cricketer
Joined
Jan 10, 2004
Online Cricket Games Owned
And so does 99% of all present and past bowlers. :p
 

Ajit

Club Cricketer
Joined
Apr 29, 2004
Online Cricket Games Owned
Anyone knowing about 1% that don't chuck.
 

T20

Panel of Selectors
Joined
Mar 11, 2003
Ramnaresh Sarwan is one :D

Very interesting results btw..
 

sohum

Executive member
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Location
San Francisco, CA
Profile Flag
India
Aha.....so they just singled out Murali because he is such a devastating bowler. Hahaha...can't beat them? Eliminate them.
 

djkay

School Cricketer
Joined
Jan 10, 2004
Online Cricket Games Owned
sohummisra, i think you put that nicely dude. Bret Lee was called for chucking, but most Australians wouldn't even know about it. Most of it was dealt with-out any media coverage and the covered up pretty good. Just goes to show how much crap all asian crickerters have to go through. But things are slowley changing.
 

djkay

School Cricketer
Joined
Jan 10, 2004
Online Cricket Games Owned
vibs89 said:
I knew it from before that Murali chucks thats why he became famous and got all the wickets

VIBS, did you even read the article?
 

fardin

PC Awards 2005 Most Improved Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2004
Online Cricket Games Owned
dude shabbir ahamed he just bends his arm and bowl's any one see him bowling he always chuckkkk'
 

sohum

Executive member
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Location
San Francisco, CA
Profile Flag
India
Oh he chucks that's why he became infamous and got all the wickets. I am sure you did not read the article or see that little documentary on ESPN star of Murali bowling all his deliveries with a brace (oh but, that was not match conditions). The stuff about Asian cricketers is right on the dot.

Another prime example is of match-fixing scandals. Asian countries will do everything they can to keep their image untarnished--take the examples of Mohammad Azharuddin and Ajay Jadeja being banned for life after they were accused of the crime. Now take the example of Mark Waugh who has had numerous match-fixing allegations. All of them have been brushed under the carpet. He has been given maximum 2-game suspensions by his board.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top